Archive | Product Reviews

Review: Patriot Wildfire 120GB

It is been a long time coming, but Patriot has finally released its own SandForce-based SSD, the performance-oriented Patriot Wildfire 120GB.

Like main school youngsters vying for peer respect by racing up and down the school field, solid state drives (SSDs) are speed freaks. They’re continually attempting to outdo one yet another at read/write performance, and occasionally falling over and grazing their figurative knees.

We say figurative, since when an actual main school kid falls over and grazes their knee, parents do not announce a enormous recall of nine year olds the way SSD manufacturers had to when it turned out the SandForce 2281 controller had gone awry.

With all that nasty company (hopefully) behind us, and new SSDs sporting a revised version of that specific controller, we can enjoy the speedy stuff with out tears.

Patriot wildfire 120gb

Against the cream of the OCZ crop, the OCZ Vertex 3, Patriot’s Wildfire is an impressive little performer.

The OCZ drive nonetheless has the edge in the real-world file decompression test, but the Wildfire takes the lead when it comes to the far more synthetic benchmarks.

Patriot wildfire 120gb: benchmarks

Patriot wildfire 120gb review

Patriot’s Wildfire 120GB model is undoubtedly quicker than nearly all prior generation SSDs.

It’s priced really reasonably at about £2 per gigabyte, and is capacious enough to install not just your operating method and important apps, but a very good few games and media files too.

Positive, you lose 9GB in formatting the drive, but them’s the apples with SSDs. It’s an attractive proposition from Patriot then, with its very first foray into 6Gbps SATA 3 SSDs.

One of the very best features the rejuvenated SF 2281 controller has to supply is DuraWrite.

In short, this is s a form of information compression that minimises excessive traffic to the flash cells and excessive writes. To quote the details SandForce gave us, 25GB of writes are involved in installing Windows 7 and Office 2007 to a standard HDD or SSD. With DuraWrite, that’s chopped down to just 11GB.

That’s definitely great news for maintaining the high performance of your SSD. And this Wildfire is undoubtedly a high performance SSD.

Read and write times in compressible and uncompressible information are up there with the huge boys – OCZ’s Vertex 3 and the new kid on the block, A-Data’s S511.

In truth, it outperforms each drives when dealing with uncompressible (or already compressed) data. Write times are especially impressive in this kind of task.

Pitted against Corsair’s 120GB Force three and the impressive new A-Information S511 drive – all of which use the SF 2281 controller – the Patriot Wildfire shines. Corsair’s asynchronous NAND hobbles its performance, whereas the Patriot Wildfire rivals the larger A-Data’s speeds.

Although it cannot very maintain up with the two quickest drives on the marketplace in compressible, uncompressible and 4K random reads, the plucky Patriot Wildfire consistently impresses with write performances across all these locations.

When you examine just how minimal the performance gap is in reads too, the overall speed of this Patriot Wildfire is wonderful.

We didn’t expertise any crashes or tell-tale Bios disappearances with this or the A-Data SSD, so it looks like the early dramas with the SandForce controller are over.

What we’re left with is a new generation of SSDs with read/write times that virtually push the SATA 6Gbps interface to bottleneck their performance. It is lucky there are plans afoot to extend the bandwidth of the SATA interface further.

It is the lengthy-term perspective that is so critical with SSDs, though, and in the coming months there is guaranteed to be an influx of unruly newcomers jostling with each and every other to be very first to the end of the school field.

We liked

The Patriot Wildfire is a speedy, solid small SSD, and we’ve been impressed by the package it’s put together. The drive keeps pace with the massive boys of the SSD market and in some places in fact manages to outshine them.

We disliked

There genuinely is not a lot to dislike about the Patriot Wildfire costs are on par with other performance 120GB drives, but it does nonetheless run to £2/GB.

Final word

This Patriot Wildfire 120GB is as great as we’ve observed from the new class, and we can heartily recommend it for now.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Review: Doodlebit Doodlekit

Doodlekit is yet another on the internet-only internet site builder, but it does factors differently to Yola.

With Yola, when we began making our internet site we were asked to fill in most of the details very first. Our fundamental internet site was then built with the data we had provided.

Doodlekit takes a minimum of data, including the site name and what kind of website it will be (individual or skilled), and then creates a website with placeholder text and images. The text explains how every single area of the site works, and how you can edit it. It is a comparable approach to that used by Xara Internet Designer 7 Premium, and it works properly.

Editing the web page is as simple as hovering the mouse over the relevant section and clicking ‘Edit’. When we clicked on a section, a new window opened. This let us edit the page in a WYSIWYG interface, or via HTML. The capacity to add your own code is great for giving you added manage over your website, and allowed us to add some much more advanced functions.

While adding photo albums, photos and tables is pretty easy, Doodlekit lacks the drag-and-drop simplicity of some of the other tools here when it comes to adding a lot more advanced website capabilities. Rather you click a button to add the HTML, which you require to locate yourself. It is not that complicated – especially if you have encounter of using HTML – but it meant that it took us slightly longer to produce a fully functioning internet site than some other packages.

Adding PayPal or Google Checkout to your site is also fairly straightforward, though you cannot embed the store or your items into an existing internet page. The option to generate a store is not immediately obvious – and is not accessible to owners of totally free accounts – so a small digging is necessary.

You can add the HTML for shopping carts manually if you have a no cost account. Doodlekit claims that no HTML information is required, which is accurate to an extent. You can make a straightforward website without having trouble, but to make the most of the features and to generate a much more versatile site, you want to know a bit of code.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Evaluation: Xara Web Designer 7 Premium

Xara is one of the UK’s oldest software program developers, and considering that 1981 it has been related a lot more with drawing and illustration software than web design.

Regardless of this, its Web Designer software is now in its seventh version, and the expertise the firm has accrued over the years is readily evident, from its achieved interface to the versatile tools contained inside – some taken straight from Xara’s excellent style computer software.

Double-clicking a template from the Design Gallery gave us a prepared-created site that just necessary us to replace the placeholder text and images. If you basically want to get a website up and running swiftly, this is all you want to do.

There are fairly a few templates to select from, and they range from the insipid to the moderately appealing, and whilst they err far more towards bland than mind-blowing, they supply a great base to start designing a web site.

Xara Web Designer 7 Premium delivers a lot of scope for configuring templates to make eye-catching and unique internet sites that fit your vision. We particularly liked the reality that that when we changed the simple colours of the template, our web site reflected the modifications in actual time.

Every single template comes total with a quantity of internet pages that can be easily arranged and edited, with links in your site’s navigation updating automatically. This let us concentrate on editing the layout and adding vital characteristics rather than having to fiddle with the typically frustrating details of website creation. There’s also a handy tool that optimises all images on your site for use on the web.

Advanced functions like embedded videos and Google Maps can be dragged and dropped onto a web site, and the range of included ecommerce widgets – which includes PayPal and Google Checkout tools – is very good, although in practise they just take you to a internet site where you download the HTML to insert yourself.

Nevertheless, with Xara’s robust range of tools at our disposal, we had been able to make an appealing and totally functioning ecommerce web site in just over an hour.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Evaluation: Apple Final Cut Pro X

That Final Cut Pro (FCP) had lately been showing its age is no secret. Most of the innovation was really taking location in the consumer field with iMovie, and there had been several capabilities that expert editors were eyeing with envy.

These were attributes such as: skimming through thumbnails to get a preview of clips to tremendously speed up the selection procedure becoming able to label clips with different key phrases to make it effortless to discover the appropriate 1 in seconds giving each project its own scratch disk as opposed to having one set for the application a much more up-to-date font and text architecture instead of the antiquated one that hadn’t changed considering that FCP’s introduction and being able to see when an audio clip is peaking just by glancing at the waveform in the timeline, rather than getting to listen to it suitable.

All these were added to FCP X (pronounced ‘ten’), along with a lot of other people including a 64-bit architecture (meaning you can feed it as considerably RAM as you can cram into your Mac, rather than be limited to only 4GB), background rendering and the ability to function with any files from SD to 4K – even inside the very same project. All this sounds great, so why all the fuss on-line and even on comedy shows?

It’s simply because Apple decided to get rid of a lot of what several expert editors depended on and never ever thought about until it was taken away from them.

Take the primary column in the browser window, which employed to stay anchored on the left-hand side – no matter how far down the proper you’d scroll to see a lot more of the clip’s metadata, you’d by no means lose track of its name. Well, that’s gone.

Final cut pro x

And what about adding keyframes to animate any parameter, which was automatic each and every time you modified its value soon after getting set the very first one? Missing in action. Then there are the clips in the browser that kept the last In and Out points you’d set the totally free creation of chapter markers along your timeline the ability to drag any clip anywhere on the timeline, making gaps if you required them (or not) and the projects that could be of virtually any dimension.

None of these – nor numerous others – are feasible with FCP X. Bigger omissions include: a complete lack of multi-camera support an inability to natively export to OMF, AAF or EDL files to move your project to other programs for further manipulation no alternative to send a clip to Motion from the timeline to add effects to it no correct support for connecting to a broadcast monitor and no possibility of importing projects designed with an earlier version of FCP.

Final cut pro x

This is all because FCP X isn’t an upgrade but version 1. of a fully new program. What’s confusing is that Apple kept the exact same name and discontinued the Final Cut Studio suite when FCP X was released, forcing men and women to move to the new application. And if they couldn’t, they had to contemplate their possibilities – hence the anger and confusion.

Curiously enough, Apple kept the older version alive when transitioning users from Mac OS 9 to OS X and even iMovie 6 to 7, so why they haven’t carried out so this time is a bit of a mystery. But if so significantly is missing, what does this new software offer aside from the above?

Final cut pro x

For one factor, you can edit more files in their native format, such as AVCHD, avoiding the lengthy transcoding process and saving you a fair quantity of disk space. You can finally function with AAC and MP3 audio files with out getting to render them initial, and clips shot with any iOS device now display as expected.

FCP X can also import iMovie projects, creating a clear and effortless migration path for up-and-coming editors.

The new magnetic timeline keeps your clips together, avoiding unintentional gaps and creating sure you in no way overwrite clips by mistake, or move the audio and video out of sync when moving things around (unless of course that’s your intention).

There is no such thing as layers anymore: clips can be added above existing ones as you wish, but all are linked to the main Storyline, which is basically the 1st layer. This is an entirely new editing concept that will take some obtaining utilized to.

The entire process feels like you’re being looked soon after, which is fantastic for 1st-time editors, but veterans might properly feel constrained since they can’t work the way they’re utilised to. Numerous keyboard shortcuts are the exact same, but quite a couple of are various. Thankfully, there’s a potent shortcut customisation selection, but this can’t disguise the fact that you are getting to learn an entirely new program.

Final cut pro x

There are a lot of things to like in this release, such as the capability to mouse over an effect and see how it modifications a selected clip prior to applying it (holding down the Choice important as you do so intensifies the impact), and the new colour correction tools are impressive, but too a lot is missing for professionals.

Since it’s so low cost although, you need to consider buying it and running it alongside FCP 7 (which will still function with Lion), then find out how to use it as you maintain earning funds with the older version.

Apple’s promised to update its new program quick and you do not want to get left behind when younger editors can do issues much better and quicker thanks to the changes in FCP X.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Review: Equinux iSale 5.8

On the web auction tool iSale takes significantly of the tedium out of preparing and uploading your eBay auctions.

With over 200 templates to select from, creating eye-catching listings is a easy job. Pictures can be dragged and dropped into preset picture boxes, information can be typed or copied into text fields and the overall layout can be tweaked to suit your wants.

Don’t anticipate full-on DTP facilities though. The template’s backgrounds can’t be customised, so you’re stuck with the original images and colours.

iSale’s fantastic at dealing with photos, though. It is straightforward to add numerous pictures for totally free by hosting them on the internet, without having any awkward HTML editing. You can even embed videos.

This new version, which is totally free for iSale five users, expands the app’s investigation tools. The Research Assistant searches important websites for similar items, and is joined by eBay’s new product catalogue, permitting you to locate and add product information quickly and simply.

Stability and performance have been improved too. As before, Draft, Running and Finished Auctions are grouped, and you can set up smart folders to sort them. You can relist items no 1 bought, or edit and reuse old auctions when selling a comparable item.

It also monitors running auctions and delivers right after-sale capabilities, but they’re no less complicated to use than the eBay website.

iSale’s strengths lie in the beginning of the method – preparing auctions, reusing old listings and uploading them at a time of your picking. For that, it’s worth the cash.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Review: Creative Sound Blaster Tactic 3D Omega

The Creative Sound Blaster Tactic 3D Omega is one of the very best gaming headsets we’ve ever tested.

Individuals talk about sound quality a lot. Several merchandise claim to deliver crystal clear audio and most press releases for these goods declare an unrivalled attention to detail and sound top quality as opposed to anything the world has ever seen. Exclamation marks are often deployed at the finish of these sentences!!!

Most of the time, of course, it is all a complete load of dingo’s gonads. But the Sound Blaster Tactic 3D Omega is the real deal.

In the box

The Omega headset comes in a number of different pieces. In the box there is the headset itself, the USB soundcard dongle, numerous USB cables, a stand which you must assemble yourself, and some audio cables for connecting the dongle to a games console.

Creative sound blaster tactic 3d omega

The headset itself is wireless, so you will require to charge it for a great 5 or six hours (more like eight if you charge from a USB port) using a microUSB cable just before you can use it. There’s a USB port on the dongle itself which will relay a charge into the headset via your computer’s USB port, but it is much quicker to use a appropriate microUSB charger – lots of mobile phones come with those these days.

Creative sound blaster tactic 3d omega

The earcups include 50mm drivers which offer you a potent punch and an all-round meaty sound. There’s none of the treble-heavy audio that you get with numerous other gaming headsets. The headset is big and weighty, too, with a good headband for comfort and massive, bouncy earpads for a snug fit as well as excellent noise isolation.

On the headphones you have got an on/off button which you press and hold, there is volume up/down controls as nicely as a microSD charging port and the port for connecting your Xbox 360 controller.

Creative sound blaster tactic 3d omega

Cross-platform

The Creative Sound Blaster Tactic 3D Omega gaming headset is platform agnostic, which indicates it’ll function with a PC, Mac, PS3 and Xbox 360.

With the PC and Mac, it acts as the system’s soundcard and conducts all of the sound processing itself. Nevertheless, when in console mode (there is a slide-switch on the front), the USB dongle acts as far more of a conduit among the PS3 and Xbox 360′s own sound systems, and the great headset itself.

So although it acts as a two-way communications throughput for the consoles, you can also use the line-in port on the back with any other sound device. If you want to listen to your iPod making use of the headset, one way would be to just plug it into the three.5mm port.

Creative sound blaster tactic 3d omega

In theory you could use this approach to hook a Nintendo Wii up to the headset too – you’d just require to attach your TV’s audio-out port into the dongle’s audio-in port – it would only function for sound though, the microphone wouldn’t function.

Connecting the Omega headset port to a console is a case of connecting the Xbox 360 or PS3′s red and white composite cables to the 3.5mm adaptor supplied in the box, and plugging the dongle in via the supplied microUSB cable. You then have to alter your consoles’ audio settings so that they know to send the sound out by way of composite instead of HDMI – directions are included.

There’s also an further inline volume control for Xbox 360 gamers – you plug 1 finish into the headset and the other into your 360 controller just like you’d usually do with the 360′s bundled headset.

In common it’s not the easiest setup for anybody without having a tiny bit of confidence with tech, but for anyone utilized to fiddling about with USB cables, audio devices and changing the settings on the consoles themselves, it is a fairly straight-forward procedure.

Classic PC or Mac

THX software

The dongle and headset setup is a collaboration in between Creative and THX, the former supplying a lot of sound-processing know-how.

THX software

Gone is the old X-Fi branding, and in comes the THX TruStudio Pro software suite which offers the exact same Crystalizer, Surround and Intelligent Volume attributes as we’ve noticed several times prior to, but also improved bass boost and a wonderful Dialog Plus mode to boost dialogue in movies and other media.

THX software

Several gaming headsets – such as a lot of the good ones – function nicely for gaming, but aren’t fantastic for listening to music or watching movies. But the identical can not be stated for this headset – sound top quality is decent across the board.

THX software

Music playback has a delicate balance of meaty bass and delicate, precise treble although movies sound equally good. The software settings enable you to customise your setup for personal preference, too.

The Dialog Plus setting, in particular, works quite properly and does a good job of bringing dialogue to the forefront with out compromising the rest of the sound spectrum.

There’s also a customisable TacticProfile which enables you to save your own settings or use pre-configured settings from pro-gamers, as well as the now-regular programmable VoiceFX method for voice morphing into in-game characters or in the course of VoIP chats. Yay for talking like an alien.

These settings are, of course, not offered when utilizing the headset with a games console. And due to the a variety of cables that want switching and settings that need changing, this is not a device you will be wanting to move around your home.

You will not want to be making use of it as your primary PC headset and your console headset – it’s just too awkward and fiddly to be moved about like that.

Creative sound blaster tactic 3d omega

The Creative Sound Blaster Tactic 3D Omega is a excellent headset. If delivers truly superb, versatile sound good quality across the board which is some thing challenging to uncover in many gaming headsets.

We liked:

The headset is really comfy to wear and easy to set up on a pc – the software and drivers auto-install when you plug the dongle in via USB.

Sound high quality is superb, and the THX software works well and enables you to set up your sound profile any way you see fit.

We disliked:

Battery life of the headset is maybe the only disappointment. We identified the batteries last around 10 hours or so, though if you’ve got a lengthy enough microUSB cable/charger, you can use the headset even though plugged into the power.

The cost is also a bit steep. £150 may be a good cost for a headset that works with all these diverse devices, but you won’t be utilizing it with all your devices. It’s only genuinely designed to work with 1 device – it is too fiddly to be unplugging it and plugging it in somewhere else.

If we have to nit-pick we’d also say that the press-and-hold technique of turning the headset on and off is just a tad too slow – it takes too long for the headset to turn on and off.

Verdict:

As far as gaming headsets go, this is a good’un. Outstanding sound high quality, mixed with versatility and a assortment of settings and choices make for a very attractive alternative. But can you justify £150 on a gaming headset?

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Assessment: 11-inch MacBook Air 2011

The 2011 MacBook Air refresh retains the form factor introduced with 2010′s line of ultraportables, but makes considerable improvements to the core technologies. Apple has switched the ageing Core 2 Duo chips for new Sandy Bridge processors, the Mini DisplayPort has been replaced by a versatile and effective Thunderbolt port and the backlit keyboard makes a welcome return too.

The new MacBook Air range (check out our 13-inch MacBook Air evaluation) contains 4 off-the-shelf versions. The cheapest provides an 11-inch screen, 64GB of flash storage and 2GB of memory for £849. The subsequent in line, also an 11-inch model, has a 128GB SSD and 4GB of RAM for £999. A similarly spec’d 13-inch MacBook Air expenses £100 more, whilst for £1349 you can get a 256GB flash drive.

All four MacBook Airs have dual-core Intel Core i5 processors (1.6GHz for the 11-inch models, 1.7GHz for the 13-inch notebooks), with Intel HD Graphics 3000 integrated graphics. Every has two USB two. ports, usefully positioned with one on each side of the notebook, and a Thunderbolt port. The 13-inch model also has an SD card reader. All the Airs also have a FaceTime camera that supports full native resolution on the built-in display and up to 2560 x 1600 pixels on an external display.

The MacBook Air we’re reviewing here is the a lot more pricey of the two 11-inch models, but enhanced by the optional customisations offered when ordering at the Apple on the internet shop. The processor has been beefed up to a dual-core 1.8GHz Intel Core i7 and the flash storage drive has been doubled in size to 256GB. Naturally, these enhancements take their toll on the price.

This custom-built MacBook Air expenses £1,399, which is more costly than the priciest off-the-shelf model. But is it worth the additional dollars, and do you really require all that power in an 11-inch MacBook Air?

The customised 11-inch MacBook Air has a dual-core 1.8GHz Intel Core i7 processor with 4MB shared L3 cache. This is a important step up from the Core two Duo chips utilized in the 2010 models.

These new second-generation Sandy Bridge Core i-series processors feature Hyper Threading, which enables two threads to be run on every single of their two cores. This means that when you are running applications built to take benefit of many cores, the chip can spread tasks a lot more evenly and work a lot more efficiently.

An additional valuable feature is Turbo Increase 2., which increases the processor’s maximum running speed at times of intense require. It is only a temporary increase and it can only cut in when power and temperature considerations allow, but Turbo Increase two. activates more often and stays on for longer than the Turbo Increase feature in the original Core i-series chips. It is automatic too, requiring no user intervention.

11-inch 1.8ghz macbook air review: side-on view of ports

Thunderbolt, meanwhile, is an exciting new I/O technologies that can handle video as well as information transfer. A Thunderbolt port is the exact same size as the Mini DisplayPort it replaces and you can plug in a Mini DisplayPort external screen without having utilizing an adapter cable.

If you want a DVI, HDMI or VGA connection, you can purchase an adapter. As a data port, it provides transfer speeds of 10Gbps in each directions, which is 12 times faster than FireWire 800 and 20 times quicker than USB two.. You can daisy chain up to six devices on a single Thunderbolt port too. Interestingly, Thunderbolt adapters for gigabit Ethernet and FireWire 800 are planned, bringing each to the MacBook Air for the initial time.

Like all MacBook Airs, our model lacks an optical drive. If you want to install software or rip music from a CD or DVD, you can use Apple’s Remote Disc feature to share another computer’s drive as long as it is on the exact same network, or buy a USB Apple SuperDrive for £66.

Unlike the prior generation of MacBook Air, the operating method and bundled software program isn’t supplied on a read-only thumb drive either. Rather, OS X 10.7 Lion can be reinstalled over the web using its built-in recovery partition, although the bundled iLife applications (now down to iPhoto, iMovie and GarageBand – iWeb and iDVD are no longer included) can be downloaded for totally free from the Mac App Shop.

The backlit keyboard, which lights up your notebook’s keys in low-light conditions, has lengthy been a favourite feature of MacBook users. For some reason, it was removed for the 2010 refresh of the MacBook Air, but it’s back on this new 2011 model, so you can once again sort in the dark without tilting your screen forwards to illuminate the keys.

Some things remain the very same, though. The battery is nonetheless very good for about five hours of internet surfing. As often, closing the lid puts the MacBook Air into Sleep mode and, like the last generation, following an hour asleep it goes into Standby mode – an ultra-low power state that takes around 30 days to drain a completely charged battery.

The screen is nonetheless a lovely 11.6-inch LED-backlit glossy widescreen display with a pixel resolution of 1366 x 768, a figure you’d expect from most 13-inch notebooks. The body is when again based on Apple’s construction procedure, which has included the display housing from the last refresh, using 48% fewer parts and enabling a thinner yet stronger MacBook Air.

The 2011 MacBook Air is an amazing machine, a fact borne out by our test results. The new Sandy Bridge 1.8GHz Core i7 processor soon showed its worth. In our Cinebench test, which measures the MacBook Air’s 3D rendering capabilities, the new chip’s Hyper Threading feature gave it a fantastic advantage over the prior models.

Its multicore score was nearly 159% higher than the 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo 11-inch MacBook Air from 2010, and over 90% up on the 1.86GHz 13-inch model.

Our Xbench test, which looks at the CPU and storage drive, also showed a huge improvement for the 2011 MacBook Air, almost doubling last year’s 1.86GHz 13-inch model’s score. In fact, the only test in which the new Air did not trounce the 2010 notebooks was our Doom three frame rate test.

The Sandy Bridge’s integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 chipset is on a par with the prior generation’s Nvidia GeForce 320M (which couldn’t be integrated into Core i-series processors due to a legal dispute), but it isn’t really as very good at rendering 3D games. Its score of 62.7 frames per second (fps) beat the 2010 1.4GHz 11-inch MacBook Air’s 51.7fps, but was a little behind the 1.86GHz 13-inch model’s 69 fps.

11-inch 1.8ghz macbook air review: side by side with 13-inch model

The SSD indicates boot-up time is really low. What’s far more, you can make use of Standby mode by closing the lid without having switching the power off, which means your MacBook will be instantly on when you open the lid again. This is ideal for times when you’re most likely to use your laptop or computer regularly but in short bursts, such as blogging at a show or event.

Like all new Mac notebooks, battery life is superb too, with a full charge giving up to five hours of web surfing and up to 30 days in Standby Mode. We also tested it by running the BBC iPlayer’s live feed at full screen and it lasted an impressive two hours and 34 minutes.

The screen is remarkable, with outstanding viewing angles crisp, consistent colours and a pixel resolution that’s on a par with many 13-inch laptops. Its modest size and widescreen aspect ratio are ideal for watching a movie or Television show on an aeroplane or train, and the backlit keyboard makes it straightforward to type in low-light conditions.

We won’t see the benefit of the move to Thunderbolt until a lot more compatible peripherals (or at least adapters) are released. Third-party producers seem very slow on the uptake with this one. But because it offers all the functions of the Mini DisplayPort it replaces, it’s not to our disadvantage in the brief term.

We’ve no hesitation in recommending the new 2011 11-inch MacBook Air. Just before investing £1,399 in the customised, 256GB Core i7 version reviewed here, though, ask oneself what you are going to use it for and no matter whether you need to have to invest that considerably. Are you going to use it as a handy carry-about personal computer, some thing you can drop in your bag and use on the move, before syncing with your principal Mac at home once again? If so, the £849 entry-level 2011 MacBook Air might nicely prove powerful sufficient.

11-inch 1.8ghz macbook air review: main view

The mid-2011 MacBook Air refresh sees the range move to Intel’s new Sandy Bridge Core i-series processors. The backlit keyboard makes a welcome return, even though the Mini DisplayPort has been replaced by a Thunderbolt port.

The new Airs have the exact same form factor as the prior generation and also retain several of the functions, such as the solid state drive and LED backlit widescreen display. The MacBook Air reviewed here is the much more high-priced of the two 11-inch models, augmented with a 1.8GHz Intel Core i7 processor and 256GB SSD, which are available as options when ordering on Apple’s online shop.

We liked

The new Sandy Bridge processors are awesome, with Hyper Threading and Turbo Enhance features giving them a actual advantage over the previous generation’s Core 2 Duo chips. The backlit keyboard is a genuine boon and a feature that was sorely missed when dropped for the 2010 release. Meanwhile, the Thunderbolt port will prove its worth over time as far more peripherals are released.

We disliked

The Air’s graphical abilities have stood nonetheless. Even though far from poor, this area doesn’t benefit from the same type of wonderful leap forward that processing power has enjoyed. The model reviewed here could struggle to uncover its niche too, proving too little to use as a main Mac and too pricey to be a handy portable. It’s a call only you as the end user can make, but an entry-level 11-inch MacBook Air may be a lot more proper for your needs.

Verdict

We have no hesitation in recommending the 2011 11-inch MacBook Air, but just before spending £1,399 on this expensively customised model, you need to ask your self if you really want the additional power and storage. If you want your Air as a convenient portable Mac to supplement to your major machine, you may be better off with an entry-level model.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Evaluation: Brother DCP-J925DW

Brother has a reputation for inexpensive printers with solid but unspectacular printouts. Its new range offers a better feature set than previous Brother multifunction products, but its print quality still lags behind its leading rivals. The DCP-J925DW is the priciest of three new DCP models, but is still only £150.

It has Wi-Fi ‘n’, Ethernet and USB connectivity, and its single paper tray has a space for postcard-sized photo paper. You still have to remove it and make a mechanical adjustment before printing photos, but it’s easier than with previous Brother printers.

Duplex printing and copying are catered for, as is Pictbridge, printing from USB and most SD/MS formats, and even printing to optical discs.

Indeed, the DCP-J925DW is surprisingly fast for a budget home printer, taking just over two minutes to print a 20-page text document, and around four and a half minutes for a top-quality A4 photo.

Its text printing is robust but a little unspectacular, with characters a bit grey and blurred around the edges. Default-quality plain-paper colour printouts are bleached and banded.

After boosting the print resolution and using quality photo paper it gives reasonable results, but the colours are a little washed out and over-red, and there’s a noticeable banding on the greyscale ramp.

These problems aren’t hugely detrimental to the overall picture quality, but they’re definitely noticeable when compared to any of Canon’s PIXMA range or the HP Photosmart’s output.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Evaluation: Audio Pro WF100

Back in September Apple released AirPlay, its streaming protocol capable of wirelessly transmitting your iTunes media to compatible hardware. Given that then we’ve seen a handful of hi-fi stereos and speakers come with support for AirPlay’s lossless audio component.

Nonetheless, that’s fat use if you already own an otherwise perfectly decent home stereo setup. Apple’s answer? Acquire an AirPort Express.

Not so fast: Scandinavian business Audio Pro thinks it has a greater remedy. The WF100 wireless audio system works by way of two USB dongles – one transmitter, one receiver – whose setup couldn’t be simpler.

Attach the transmitter to your Mac then employing the supplied USB AC power adapter and RCA Y-cable (or mini jack), connect the receiver to your stereo amp. There is no fiddling with drivers here: just select USB sound output in your OS X preferences then watch the dongle LEDs quickly turn blue to signal they’ve paired – leaving you to enjoy crystal-clear, delay-free audio from up to 50m away.

Audio Pro’s proprietary protocol is universal and provides program-wide audio streaming, which trumps AirPlay’s iTunes-only limitation. You can even expand your wireless setup by adding additional receivers, but coming in at £85 a pop, this rears the ugly head of expense.

At £150, the WF100 set feels pricey for what it is. But if you’re eager to mate your Mac with legacy audio equipment that still shines, the benefit may just outweigh the cost.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Review: BetterSnapTool 1.2.3

Window management, in terms of on-screen placement, is 1 of the Mac’s weakest areas, and although OS X Lion’s full-screen mode will be fine for focussing on a single task, Windows 7 does a lot greater when it comes to several applications.

BetterSnapTool is however another app that brings Windows Snap-like features to the Mac, but it warrants a look simply due to living up to its name – in other words, this genuinely is a far better snap tool.

Preferences enable mouse and keyboard settings to be activated or deactivated. On the second of those, you can define shortcuts for maximising a window or sending it to a half, quarter or third of the screen. You can also fire a window to another screen on a numerous-monitor setup.

Further customisation possibilities exist for amending the appearance of the preview overlay when employing the mouse to snap windows, delay settings and click actions on window buttons and the window’s title bar. For example, you can appropriate-click the zoom button to maximise a window and double-click the title bar to show the actions menu.

Options also exist to move or resize windows below the cursor when a modifier’s held. The lack of gesture support is a pity and the app’s restore is far more like an undo.

But with its wholesome spree of options and unusually low cost, BetterSnapTool’s now our favourite app of this type on the Mac.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Evaluation: IcyDock MB982SPR-2S

Linguist and psychologist Noam Chomsky refers to the phrase ‘cellar door’ as the most linguistically pleasing in the whole English language. We do wonder if he’s heard the phrase ‘icy dock’…

We digress. Icy Dock’s MB982SPR-2S allows up to two 2.5-inch hard storage drives to be converted to 3.5-inch form factor. Handy for saving space inside smaller cases, keeping your storage bays nice and neat, and especially useful if you want to use two SSDs in a RAID setup.

Inside the MB982SPR-2S, two 2.5-inch drives can be connected simultaneously, the Icy Box itself connecting to the SATA and power connectors.

Using a dial on the back, you can choose from RAID0, RAID1, BIG and Port Multiplier modes in hardware and software modes. And here’s where the problems start.

We found setting up any RAID array in hardware mode impossible, as the Icy Dock won’t reset properly even with updated firmware. With the third party software that we had to track down ourselves, the process is still riddled with crashes and disappearing drives.

For £56 this should be much easier. Avoid.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Review: Hanns G HL225D

How much difference can a good monitor make to your PC? If you are into editing pictures, a screen with flawless colour representation and sharpness is essential. For gamers, add high native resolution and fast response time to that list.

Even the casual PC ought to be able to watch videos of zoo animals sneezing and strangers’ infant children laughing in sparkling high definition. Will the Hanns G HL225 set your eyes alight with blinding, unbearable beauty?

No. But come on, it costs a hundred quid – give it a chance! It is 1 of numerous competing value-end 22-inch screens snapping for your £100 like rectangular black piranhas, alpha males of the pack being the Liyama Prolite E2208HD and Viewsonic’s VX2239WM 22.

Like both these snappily named screens, Hanns G’s offering supports 1920 x 1080p natively, and has a 1000:1 contrast ratio. No HDMI connector here though, which appears a bit stingy.

The colour quality isn’t anything to get excited about either. Blacks get a bit muddy, whites get a bit washed out, and the ‘X-Contrast’ setting only appears to accentuate this.

Such is the competition at this cost point that even these minor bugbears means the HL225D loses a lot of ground to the forerunners.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Review: Asus RoG Crosshair V Formula

With the Asus Republic of Gamers Crosshair V Formula it has produced a board that makes us virtually want to suggest it regardless of regardless of whether or not Bulldozer is much cop.

We’ve looked at a few motherboards based on AMD’s 9-series chipsets now, and so far the general impression has been that they’re OK. Unfortunately it all truly depends on the forthcoming FX (aka Bulldozer) processors to make them worthwhile.

Like other Crosshair, Rampage and Maximus motherboards in the RoG series, it is a stupidly over specified board that just makes you want to grin.

It’s unlikely most folks would even know what to do with half of the functions included, let alone actually use them. So becoming able to say you own a motherboard that functions them carries its own form of geek cache.

What sort of points do we mean?

There is the optional remote for overclocking, for a start, and the power out points for taking manual volt readings of the main motherboard rails. There is the plethora of diagnostic LEDs, the inclusion of two full 16 lane graphics ports for two way SLI or Crossfire… the list goes on.

There’s clearly not a lot of performance difference between the 990FX and the 990X chipsets from AMD, and even the lower spec 960 is not far behind.

What’s much more intriguing than the performance benchmarks, maybe, is the power usage. Playing about with ASUS’ EPU settings can lower this even further.

Asus rog crosshair v formula: benchmarks

Asus rog crosshair v formula: benchmarks

Asus rog crosshair v formula: benchmarks

Asus rog crosshair v formula: benchmarks

Asus rog crosshair v formula: benchmarks

Asus rog crosshair v formula

What’s good about the Crosshair V is that in spite of becoming so properly equipped it isn’t intimidating.

Getting mentioned all that, the Crosshair V Formula is not the most extremely specced motherboard ASUS has ever created.

Some of the extras that you will discover in the Extreme range of motherboards like Bluetooth – which is helpful for overclocking via a mobile phone – are noticeable by their absence.

But there is a host of techniques the Asus RoG Crosshair V Formula makes points effortless for the user.

The new UEFI graphical BIOS, for example is effectively laid out and simple to use. And even though the ASUS software utilities are hateful if you ever try to uninstall them, so lengthy as you leave them performing their own factor they’re a straightforward gateway to controlling not just the CPU clock settings but also ASUS’ Push-me-pull-you chips, TPU and EPU. These automatically undervolt or overclock other motherboard components depending on existing system load.

It is the little issues that make the biggest distinction though.

Issues like the inclusion of an X-Fi chip for sound (this isn’t a full blown X-Fi, mind, but it is better than regular on board audio) and 1 touch overclocking buttons.

There is an extra couple of USB 3. ports over and above the norm too.

Sadly, though, as fun as the Crosshair V is, value for funds does have to come into play at some point.

It’s not terrible in this regard – ASUS own Sabertooth 990FX is virtually identical but has a worse soundcard for £10 much less – but it’d nonetheless be unwise to shell out for a best spec motherboard with out knowing how good Bulldozer is going to be or how a lot it is going to expense.

And that last point is crucial – since if AMD’s next CPU can undercut its Intel rivals substantially, it is going to be worth purchasing a premium board to make the most of it.

And they don’t come a lot far more premium than this.

We liked

The Crosshair V has got just about every thing you could wish for to develop a high finish program about.

It is quickly, endlessly teakable and even has a decent on board sound chip.

The cost is not terrible either, unless you are a die challenging bargain hunter that it.

We disliked

As we stated this is a board with every thing, except that is for a great CPU to go with it.

Phenom II is yesterday’s news, and to make the Crosshair V worthwhile, Bulldozer has to be excellent. So like each other AMD 9-series motherboard at the moment it’s just a warm up to the major event.

Final word

If Bulldozer is top notch performance at a bargain cost, it’ll be worth getting a high end motherboard like this to get the most out of it.

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews1 Comment

Evaluation: Sony VAIO C-Series

Sony’s latest VAIO C-Series laptops have taken a good few pages out of Apple’s large book of design and usability. The curvaceous aesthetics, well-spaced keyboards and not-too-intrusive extra software program mean that they look and function amazingly effectively.

The Sony VAIO VPC-CA2C5E we had been sent for assessment looks the part, completed with ludicrous levels of bright green perspex and plastic – despite the fact that its hue will surely divide its target marketplace.

The C-Series undoubtedly puts the enjoyable back into computing: we haven’t noticed such bountiful use of translucent plastic considering that the iMac back in the early 2000s.

When it’s powered up, the keyboard is backlit and the whole thing glows eerily, total with etched Sony and VAIO logos. Children seem especially attracted to it, which explains a lot given its positioning as a loved ones laptop. It is offered in a range of various colours, including much more conservative blacks and whites and more vibrant pink, red, green, orange and blue.

Sony vaio vpc-ca2c5e

There’s a big gap in the marketplace for a fun and funky laptop, particularly in this 14-inch form factor. We’ve observed netbook manufacturers attempt to spice up computing with Asus’s Disney Eee, and Packard Bell’s Dot SE.

Folks seem to like customised laptops, too, and most of Dell’s XPS 15 makes it possible for cases to be customised just before you acquire them. But Sony genuinely has taken design to another level. It is a brave move, and one that’s certain to attract people who are much more into designer specs than laptop or computer specs, but what’s Sony done inside the C Series?

Sony vaio vpc-ca2c5e

Sony’s VAIO C-Series laptops can be configured via the web site, and the VPC-CA2C5E review model we had been supplied with sat firmly in the middle of the customisation options: not too bad, but could be slightly better. It is powered by an Intel Core i5 2410M processor, backed up with an AMD Radeon HD 6470M graphics chip and 4GB DDR3 RAM.

The laptop can be configured with a Core i7 or i3 processor, as properly as Intel onboard graphics and 6GB of RAM.

The body of the laptop feels substantial, and there is extremely little flex in the casing. At two.3kg, it’s not going to break your back – but we wouldn’t want to have to carry it for extended periods. It can get a bit noisy and warm as the fans kick in when you are playing videos or games, but it is by no indicates a deal breaker.

As has become normal on Sony’s laptops, there are 3 buttons for fast access to aid, the net and the VAIO media portal. They’re by no means important, and we do miss the screen-off button that’s adorned prior VAIO laptops such as the VGN-NW11Z/S – it is incredibly handy when you want to connect the laptop to a Television to watch a Blu-Ray.

Sony vaio vpc-ca2c5e

There is, unfortunately, none of Sony’s own Blu-ray magic in our C-Series evaluation model it can be added in the develop process, though.

Connectivity is amply handled by HDMI and VGA outputs, as effectively as 3 USB sockets – 1 of which is the speedy USB three.. The standard mic and headphone ports and a dual memory stick and SD Card reader complete the lineup.

Sony’s screens are nothing short of remarkable, and The C Series’ 1366 x 768 display is no exception. Colours are vibrant and the contrast powerful, but the viewing angle is a minor let-down. The size indicates you won’t be watching films on this, though, and it’s easy sufficient to connect to a large screen Television.

Sony vaio vpc-ca2c5e

The built-in webcam is similarly impressive, providing clear images and video thanks to a 1.3MP Exmor sensor. Nevertheless, for a company that prides itself on its high good quality CD players and Walkmen, the tinniness of the speakers is disappointing.

As with Sony’s other laptops, the C Series is an absolute joy in terms of usability. The separated keys make typing a doddle, and you’re not likely to get crumbs underneath them. There is a slight flex to the keyboard, but not sufficient to be noticeable.

The trackpad and buttons are equally responsive, and Sony’s integrated multi-touch makes zooming and scrolling nice and effortless.

Sony vaio vpc-ca2c5e

The Sony VAIO C-Series is disappointingly run of the mill in terms of performance. Sony has designed an all-rounder of a laptop that doesn’t do something spectacularly, and this wouldn’t be so bad if it didn’t have such a high (£719) cost tag.

Even its own less expensive laptops – such as the VAIO VPC-EB3J0E/WI – don’t score considerably lower in our benchmark tests.

The C-Series is capable when it comes to gaming, if absolutely nothing much more. It is not going to stand up to a dedicated gaming laptop, such as MSI’s GE700, but it happily chugs via most modern day titles, provided their graphics settings are low sufficient.

It’s a lot more capable when it comes to video and photo editing, thanks to the Intel Core i5 processor. HD videos play flawlessly, too, and look absolutely incredible.

Sony vaio vpc-ca2c5e

The single most disappointing factor about Sony’s C Series is the battery life, or lack thereof. Battery Eater emptied a totally charged battery in less than an hour by stressing the computer as significantly as probable. This means gaming on the move is subsequent to impossible, unless you want the computer to die a lot more swiftly than your character.

In actual-globe terms, we managed to get two hours out of the battery when word processing, and this was with Wi-Fi turned off. It’s not fantastic, and it seems Sony has created the C Series primarily as a desktop replacement PC capable of brief trips out.

Taken as a desktop replacement, its usability and bright screen stand out, and it is perfectly capable of multitasking a word processor, media playback and web browsing. But most netbooks – such as Samsung’s NC110 – are capable of this level of performance, and they expense a third of the cost and have much better battery life.

Benchmarks
Battery Eater: 62 minutes
3D Mark 06: 5031
Cinebench: 7732

Sony vaio vpc-ca2c5e

Sony’s laptops might match Apple’s in terms of usability and style, but Sony constantly adds a couple of bells and whistles to make them stand out from the crowd. Performance, sadly, seems to come second to design in Sony’s world.

We liked

Whilst the lime green colour of our Sony VAIO C Series evaluation model is most likely to inspire either slack-jawed awe or seething hatred, there’s no denying that Sony has shaken items up in terms of style.

At the quite least it makes a change from the black and silver hunks of plastic we’ve been toting since the early 2000s. It’s a fantastic experience in terms of usability, and the bright screen, decent webcam and comfortable keyboard make it really feel substantial and solid. For media tasks and general computing it performs very effectively, too.

Sony vaio vpc-ca2c5e

We disliked

Given the array of hardware packed into the C Series, we had been disappointed with its performance. Even though it is capable of moderate gaming, there are much better dedicated alternatives for a similar cost.

Battery life is the biggest let-down here, and a mere hour at high load is frankly appalling. There are laptops out there that supply 10 times as significantly, and with the Samsung Chromebook‘s eight hour battery life, it’s become an important portion of deciding on a laptop.

Verdict

Sony vaio vpc-ca2c5e

It’s unfortunate, but the Sony VAIO C Series let us down in precisely the way we expected: it’s a total triumph of style over substance.

Regardless of its wonderful looks, and fairly beefy hardware, it just didn’t carry out as effectively as it should have. This is compounded by the price, which is too high. Medion’s Akoya E6221 expenses £240 less, but includes a comparable level of hardware specifications and performs virtually as nicely.

It’s also clear that Sony is targeting customers who like shiny and sleek Apple items, but has forgotten that the price tag has to be far more competitive in order to genuinely attract this industry.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Evaluation: Dell Inspiron 15r N5110

Dell has impressed us lately with a great range of laptops to suit all users, and the Inspiron 15r N5110 is no exception. It’s quite high-priced for a mid-range laptop, but still provides wonderful value for funds, thanks to its exceptional performance.

That additional cash buys you the most recent Intel Core i5 2410M processor, which is a step above the Core i3 processors identified in most of the other machines at this cost. Whilst other laptops can comfortably run all of your applications, the Dell supplies an extra bit of future-proofing and will not require replacing any time soon. Even the most demanding software loads speedily and runs smoothly.

You also get a effective dedicated Nvidia GT 525M graphics card, while most other laptops make do with basic integrated graphics, where the processor also has to deal with image rendering. The result is a lot better multimedia performance. High-definition (HD) movies run perfectly, you can comfortably edit all of your media, and gamers can play the most recent titles without having sacrificing graphics top quality for a smooth frame rate.

Tech Labs

Tech labs

Battery Eater ’05: 166 minutes
Cinebench: 9743
3DMark 2006: 18,968

If you take pleasure in kicking back with action games right after a tough day of studying, this is the laptop for you.

Bright screen

The 15.6-inch screen is bright, though the Packard Bell EasyNote NS44 HR-033UK compact screen is sharper. Even so, we located the Dell’s screen was vibrant sufficient to fully enjoy our photos and films, with decent viewing angles.

The built-in SRS speakers are some of the most potent, producing them excellent for music and movies, even though audiophiles will prefer a dedicated external pair.

While the Dell offers very good performance, it is by no means the most portable. We didn’t quite get three hours of use from the battery when watching films, though this is not a poor result, and if you’re merely typing out an essay or doing some other light function, you can anticipate to get another hour or so out of the battery.

At 2.7kg it is very heavy for a laptop, which also limits portability. Nonetheless, it can be carried around if needed and the body is not too chunky to be a discomfort when you have to cram it into your backpack.

This laptop may not be perfectly portable, but it’s certainly attractive. The dark brushed-metal finish looks slick, with only a small flex around the edges, and our model came with 1 of Dell’s swappable SWITCH lids. You get a choice of over twenty colourful designs, which make a refreshing change from the regular plain efforts. If you get sick of 1 style, just order a new 1 from Dell and they’ll ship it out.

Like several of the laptops here, an isolation-style keyboard has been used. The keys are nicely spaced, but we identified the board to be spongy, with considerable flex in the middle when typing. It’s not a severe problem and you soon get employed to it, but we expected greater.

Dell inspiron 15r

Connections are plentiful, with VGA and HDMI ports for hooking up external displays and even an eSATA port for attaching external difficult drives. With 500GB of built-in storage, you’ll most likely only require an external drive when backing up your essential files.

If you want the additional power and have the money to spare, the Inspiron 15r is a fantastic student laptop that will final you for a couple of years. Nevertheless, portability and usability are not as strong as we would have liked.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Assessment: Lenovo IdeaPad K1

Lenovo is going on an all-out assault on the world of tablets, creating a new division specifically for them and announcing a new range.

The Lenovo lineup includes the Windows 7-running IdeaPad Tablet P1 and two Android 3.1-powered tablets, including the business-focussed ThinkPad Tablet, and the consumer-focussed IdeaPad K1 which we have here.

As Android tablets go, it’s fairly typical when it comes to specs. The screen is 10.1 inches, with a resolution of 1280 x 800, while the processing and graphics power is provided by a Nvidia Tegra 2 chip, running at the usual 1GHz. There’s also a nice 1GB of RAM to provide plenty of memory for multitasking.

There’s 32GB of built-in storage, with a microSD card reader for adding more, and a micro-HDMI port for playing video on your HDTV. There’s also a five-megapixel rear camera, complete with LED flash, and a two-megapixel front camera.

Lenovo ideapad k1

As we mentioned, Android 3.1 is the OS of choice here, and Lenovo has jam-packed the IdeaPad K1 with additional software, which we’ll cover on the next page.

Unusually for Android 3.0 tablets, there’s actually a physical Home button, which even has gesture recognition in order to act as a Back button, too.

Lenovo ideapad k1

The front of the IdeaPad K1 is nothing special – shiny and black. There’s a massively chunky bezel around the 10.1-inch, 16:10 touchscreen, which house the Home button and the front-facing camera. The camera is designed to be used in landscape orientation, while the Home button seems meant to be used in portrait.

Around the edge of the K1 is a silver rim, which is where you’ll find the Lock/On/Off button, the volume control and an orientation lock.

Lenovo ideapad k1

On another side, you’ll find the microSD card slot, the HDMI port, a headphone jack and a docking connector, which you also use for charging and connecting to a USB port.

Lenovo ideapad k1

The back of the IdeaPad K1 is mostly plastic, with a honeycomb effect that makes it nice and grippy. The plastic isn’t very sturdy, flexing easily under even a light grip. It sounds hollow and loose when tapped, but we doubt it would actually be much of a liability in use – it just feels cheap.

There are stereo speakers on the back, too, and that rear-facing camera with flash. At 13.3mm thick and 750g, it certainly feels chunkier and heavier in the hand than the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 or the iPad 2.

Lenovo ideapad k1

It’s actually a good deal larger than the iPad 2 – it’s slightly wider, and a few centimetres longer. This is pretty much totally attributable to the size of the bezel.

The IdeaPad K1 comes in black and silver, white and silver, or a funky red and silver. You can expect to pay £369 for it.

Lenovo ideapad k1

The main way the Lenovo IdeaPad K1 stands out from the Android competition is with its range of apps. You like apps? Lenovo’s got ‘em! More than 30 of them, in fact, all included on the K1 out of the box, and that’s before you get to the standard Android Market apps.

There’s a range of games, including 3D action titles and card games, a radio app, a movie store, several music apps, a drawing app, ereading apps, instant messaging, video calling, printing, mobile security, the full version of Documents to Go, and… ah, you get the idea.

Lenovo ideapad k1

On top of that, you’ve got the Android Market and Lenovo’s own App Shop (though the K1 is restricted to Android Market installations only initially, so you’ll need to change that to use Lenovo’s store.

In many cases, all of this means that there’s a doubling up of apps. There are two gallery apps (both called Gallery, helpfully), two apps named Music (and third for accessing cloud music storage), two places to buy apps, two movie editing apps (Movie Story and the Android Movie Studio), two photo editing apps, two email apps and several ebook apps.

When you’re first trying to explore what’s on offer, it’s ridiculously confusing and overwhelming. Don’t get us wrong – we’re all for a wide choice of apps, but having so many preloaded, and with identical names to the built-in ones, is a bit much.

A more elegant solution to do something like this is to have an appealing app that offers you the option of downloading them – specifically, the way HTC does on Windows Phone 7 handsets, such as the HTC HD7.

You could argue that the Lenovo App Shop is the IdeaPad’s version of this, but the HTC Hub in Windows Phone 7 is a nice, appealing place to explore. The App Shop is an assault of adverts and low-res graphics.

Lenovo ideapad k1

Screengrabs take forever to appear, and are usually dull when they do arrive. Different content tabs can be frustratingly slow to load. On top of that, the selection doesn’t really seem to be exhaustive.

But lets be clear, many of the apps added by Lenovo do add some value. It’s nice to have a few games to play out of the box (including Angry Birds, so there’s one box ticked), and the card games in particular are good, even if performance when loading is a bit iffy.

The mSpot Movies app is included for renting films when on the go, which fills a gap in Google tablet offering.

Speaking of media, we popped a microSD card in the provided slot that was filled with music and movies, and they appeared without issue. Both Music apps found all our music and album art where possible, and the galleries apps had no problem playing back 1080p videos (we saw a few stutters here and there, but it was perfectly acceptable overall).

Lenovo ideapad k1

There are several video formats accepted, but MKV files are out, so you may find it easier to stick with MP4 and H.264.

There’s a USB cable in the box that provides a way to transfer files onto the 32GB of storage. It worked fine on Windows 7, but wouldn’t mount on any Macs we tried it on.

The web browser is the standard Android 3.1 version, complete with Adobe Flash 10.2. This means tabbed browsing, the single search/URL bar, pinch to zoom, text reflow, incognito tabs, bookmarking and all of that. We’ll go into how well it works on the next page.

Lenovo ideapad k1

All of those apps the IdeaPad K1 comes with might have sounded good, but this is the page where the wheels come off, we’re afraid.

Now, we’re used to Android having a few rough edges on tablets. That’s OK. We recognised them in our reviews of tablets such as the Motorola Xoom and Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, but found them to be great tablets regardless.

There are more than a few rough edges on the Lenovo K1. In fact, a cheese grater covered in sandpaper has fewer rough edges.

Lenovo ideapad k1

Every time you pick up the IdeaPad K1, it’s a gamble as to how long it’ll be before you’re able to use it. You pick it up and hit the lock button (you can’t turn it on with the Home button, which everyone will try to do), and it may well just not turn on.

We had it happen to us several times (including twice in one 10-minute period) where the K1 just wouldn’t come back from sleep. We had to turn it off and on again to get it to work.

When the screen does turn on for you, you’re give the Lock screen.This is where you drag the padlock circle out of the other circle. Maybe.

Perhaps it’ll all go fine, and you’ll unlock it first time. Or perhaps you’ll drag your finger and nothing will happen. In fact, nothing will continue to happen no matter how many times you poke, until the screen eventually locks itself again.

It can take several minutes before the K1 deigns to allow use it. This happens often – far, far too often – but not everytime. There doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason to it. You just take your chances.

Once you’re in the Home screen, it runs fairly smoothly. Unless it freezes in operation. As it did on us several times, requiring a restart. Again. Sigh.

No matter, you can turn the K1 back on fairly quickly. It’s at this point you might notice just how dim the screen actually is. When you have the IdeaPad on its own, you won’t necessarily notice that the 10.1-inch display isn’t very bright, but place it next to an iPad 2 and it becomes immediately obvious.

We criticised the HP TouchPad for the same thing, and this comes off slightly worse because of Android 3.1′s dark theme.

And this is all compounded if you take it into sunlight. It’s massively reflective and picks up smears like nobody’s business (although it’s hardly alone in the tablet world for having this problem).

In any case, you’re happily back in and using the K1 (perhaps in a dark room), and you fire up the web browser. You’ll now notice that web pages are a little slow to load. And once they are loaded, they’re often extremely sluggish to respond to scrolling gestures, and particularly pinching to zoom. The delay can be a few seconds.

Lenovo ideapad k1

The culprit is our old friend Flash, predictably. Having some Flash elements in a page totally crippled the browser’s responsiveness.

That said, Flash video generally played fine, though not without caveats. It was often slow to load, and some controls would act iffy, such as a button to make the video fullscreen just removing the rest of the page and leaving the video the same size.

Lenovo ideapad k1

We mentioned before that the screen is a bit too dark, but otherwise, it’s actually quite good. Colours are natural, making video appealing. The lack of brightness does let the viewing angles down, but the colours stay accurate.

The main issue for watching videos is that the twin speakers are surprisingly wimpy. The iPad 2‘s single speaker outperforms them, and the HP TouchPad‘s twin speakers easily best them. This isn’t such an issue if you’re using headphones, but we were still a little disappointed.

Lenovo ideapad k1

Of course, the good parts of Android 3.1 are still great (when they’re all working at full speed). The keyboard is very easy to type on in landscape mode, making writing an email or something in Documents to Go a breeze.

Lenovo ideapad k1

The customisable Home screens let you fill them with widgets or apps or whatever you like, which is one of Android’s strengths.

Of course, those rough edges have come through, too – particularly the issue of apps that aren’t optimised for tablets. Many say that Android phone apps scale up better than iPhone apps do on the iPad, and this is true.

But they’re usually still woefully inadequate for the big screen, leaving acres of empty space, or just wasting the opportunity to have more information available.

Lenovo ideapad k1

The most surprisingly offender is the Google+ app, freshly released from the same company who developed Android 3.1. And yet, install it on the Lenovo and most of what you’ll see is white space. We need more Android Honeycome apps, we need them fast, and we need a way to filter them from the main results.

The rear camera on the IdeaPad K1 is barely worth mentioning. It was almost impossible to get it to focus on a normal scene on a bright sunny day. This is the best we managed, and it’s appalling.

Lenovo ideapad k1Click here for full-size image

One reasonably bright spot for the K1 is battery life. It’s quoted at 10 hours, and with fairly light use, you should be able to hit that.

It also lasted well on standby, using very little power, so you can expect it to still have some juice when you pick it up after a while. We’ve seen some Android tablets, notably the Hannspree Hannspad, struggle with this.

Lenovo ideapad k1

The Lenovo IdeaPad K1 packs: the power and flexibility of Android 3.1; good specs in its 10.1-inch screen and Nvidia Tegra 2 processor; a wide range of pre-installed apps, many of which fix gaps in the basic apps of Android; a fairly good price tag, coming in cheaper than the iPad 2; and some nice features, including the microSD card slot and USB host connector.

Yet, we wouldn’t recommend it over the other options. Certainly not when compared to the Asus Eee Pad Transformer, Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 or iPad 2. Or, indeed, a great deal of the other tablets we’ve reviewed.

We liked:

The Lenovo IdeaPad K1 does have good specs. Tegra 2 should provide plenty of power, the 32GB of on-board storage is great and it’s got a big, high-res screen. For under £400, that’s not bad value for money.

We also like, in principle, that Lenovo has taken such an aggressive approach with apps. Many are superfluous, but having a full version of Documents to Go is a genuinely great thing to have on a tablet right from the start.

And though many people will find having a Home button on an Android 3.1 tablet pointless, some people will find it appealing. At least, it makes the Lenovo stand out.

We disliked:

Performance was inconsistent, but we can just about put up with that. The screen is a bit dim, but we can put up with that. Many of the included apps are confusing, and named the same as the (often better) built-in apps, but we can put up with that.

We can’t put up with a tablet that happily locks you out of it so often. Whether the lock icon is refusing to budge, or whether you just can’t turn the screen on at all, it’s frequently impossible to use the IdeaPad K1. And that’s not remotely good enough for a device that costs £400.

It crashed on us, it locked us out, it ran slowly for no apparent reason, parts of software (Flash particularly) wouldn’t behave correctly – we just got sick of not knowing if we’d be able to use it or not.

On top of that, it’s larger than the competition, and heavier. It may be cheaper than an iPad 2, but it comes in at about the same price as the Eee Pad Transformer, which strongly suggest you check out instead.

Verdict:

Lenovo’s IdeaPad K1 is a tablet with some bright ideas that can’t manage to complete the basics. The strength of tablets is that they’re computing without the friction or hassle – straight onto the web or email in seconds from picking it up. If the tablet doesn’t reliably turn on, or if the web pages won’t scroll properly, what’s the point in a tablet?

The problems with the IdeaPad K1 could possibly be fixed with an update, but as it stands, we can’t recommend it. Look at the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, the iPad 2 and the Asus Eee Pad Transformer instead.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Review: New MacBook Air 2011

Last October, Apple released the last MacBook Air. It was a mighty fine-seeking piece of hardware – a newly designed unibody shell, .3cm at its thinnest.

Trouble is, the meat inside didn’t quite match up with the supreme exterior – Apple had been forced to stick with the ageing Intel Core 2 Duo processor.

Intel had originally produced a particular, smaller packaged Core 2 Duo variant for the 1st-generation MacBook Air that was nonetheless clinging on in last year’s release.

The tiny processor package, presumably, couldn’t be bettered until this year’s Sandy Bridge generation of Intel Core chips arrived.

So here we are with the newly-launched 13-inch 2011 MacBook Air running the new Mac OS X 10.7 Lion operating program. The MacBook Air is high-priced for what it is, beginning at £849. For the components involved, it’s an high-priced system. But as with all Macs, it’s the sum of its parts that gets everybody excited – and this time, it is with really just cause.

There is no doubt about it – this is a superb-seeking and performing machine on which Apple has finally managed to bestow the performance that its look and cost deserve.

Four models are accessible – two 11-inch and two 13-inch, all with Core i5 processors as common – more on that on the next page.

The 13-inch MacBook Air is a lot more usable for most workhorse tasks than the 11-inch -despite the fact that it is still a highly capable machine.

The MacBook Air 2011 is definitely no longer the poor-powered portable Mac – indeed, Apple has so significantly faith in it that it has discontinued the MacBook for retail buy (it’s nonetheless going to be obtainable for education, apparently).

MacBook air review

It is worth mentioning that are now some genuine contenders to the MacBook Air’s ultraportable crown – the Samsung 9 Series ultraportable presents a genuine option to the MacBook Air while there is also the effective Sony VAIO Z Series and the more affordable but older Dell Adamo XPS. But even the 9 Series doesn’t have as speedy an i5 as the MacBook (1.4GHz) although the Z Series is crazily potent but just too costly.

Let’s look at the Specifications in higher depth overleaf before moving onto the Performance.

The excellent news is that the new models don’t lack for performance. Even the base models are stacked. The off-the-shelf models come with the blistering Core i5 1.6 (11-inch, £849/£999 depending on memory and SSD) or 1.7 Ghz (13-inch, £1,099/£1,349 depending on memory and SSD) variants.

Each Core i5s are dual-core with 3MB shared L3 cache. The 1.7GHz version in the 13-inch has 4GB of DDR3.

MacBook air 2011

Even better is that, for an extra £100 you can pop a 1.8GHz Core i7 into the high-end 13-inch (it’s £150 to pop it into the high end 11-inch).

It’s this processor that is what is inside the 13-inch MacBook Air Apple has been kind sufficient to loan us here. (It’s the 7-2677M, if you’re a codename aficionado).

As with the new MacBook Pros, the new MacBook Air also adopts the Intel-gestated Thunderbolt technology – once more manifesting in a DisplayPort connection. Numerous Thunderbolt products will launch in due course, but in the meantime Apple has also released a new Apple Thunderbolt Display which is a thorn in our theory that Thunderbolt is just a gimmick.

Thunderbolt

You see, the monitor acts as a docking station for the MacBook Air.

There’s Gigabit Ethernet, USB ports and FireWire – and it all connects over the Thunderbolt connection along with the video of course! We have to say, the thought of having Thunderbolt as a single point of docking connectivity is mighty appealing – even if the display is a monstrous £899.

Apple thunderbolt

The displays remain the same as the last generation, though what they’re driven by is different. In terms of pixels, the 13-inch panel is 16:10 – 1440 × 900.

Graphics punch is now supplied by Intel’s HD 3000 graphics built into the new Core chips rather than the Nvidia GeForce 320M used in the last generation. Even though Intel’s Sandy Bridge graphics are fine for most requirements, if it’s supreme graphics performance you want than you need to have a MacBook Pro.

The 13-inch Airs have 384MB of dedicated DDR3 graphics memory, although the other MacBook Airs have 384MB.

All the memory is solid state as with the last generation, and the 13-inch gives either 128GB or 256GB depending on the model. You can have up to 4GB of DDR3 memory. As such, the Air is getting to be a machine that you can use as your main method, but we doubt numerous purchasers will – once apps are installed those with large media collections will find themselves a small restricted.

1 of the most annoying points about the last MacBook Air was that a compromise had had to be created about the backlit keyboard – it disappeared to the chagrin of many possible purchasers. Thankfully, it is now properly and genuinely back. The keyboard, as ahead of, is light to the touch and incredibly pleasant to use.

As you’d anticipate from any Apple notebook, there’s the glass Multi-Touch trackpad that supports Lion’s multi-touch gestures.

Trackpad

There’s also support for Bluetooth four. ought to you be interested in that, while you also get the normal Apple FaceTime webcam (not an HD model) and an SD card in the 13-inch which was introduced with the last generation. As then, there is not the space to consist of one in the 11-inch.

The battery remains non user-replaceable, but is a 50 Watt unit in the 13-inch (compared to the 11-inch’s 35-Watt unit).

Weight is comparable to the last generation of the Air at 1.34Kg for the 13-inch. It appears strange that the MacBook Air has become Apple’s entry-level notebook. But that’s what has happened.

The Core i7 model we have in our hands is seriously quick, though getting utilized several Sandy Bridge Core i5s including the new 2011 MacBook Pro, we’re confident the performance of those machines won’t disappoint.

So the processor – don’t forget we’re checking out the Core i7 here. The Xbench CPU score checked in at 204.53 and Xbench overall (seeking at CPU, memory and tough drive performance) at 265.20. That’s measurably far better than the 2010 MacBook Air and stacks up reasonably against the quad-core Core i7 2.2GHz MacBook Pro which gave us an overall score of 402.14 and a surprisingly similar CPU rating of 253.83.

In Geekbench, the method scored 5292 overall and it’s here that the benefit of a MacBook Pro quad-core chip becomes apparent – a 2011 MacBook Pro Intel 2.2GHz Core i7-2720QM with 4GB of DDR3 1333MHz memory scores over 10,000. Last year’s 13-inch MacBook Air scored 3650. That is a 45 per cent boost in performance – practically double.

MacBook air

The previous top-of-the-range 15-inch MacBook Pro was a dual core two.66GHz Core i7. It is a tribute to the power of the second-generation Sandy Bridge chips that in our Xbench test that looks at CPU, memory and challenging drive performance, the newer 2.2GHz Core i7 processor virtually matched it, scoring 132.76 against the older Core i7 2.66GHz processor’s 136.58.

The lack in high-end graphics grunt was revealed by Cinebench, which confirmed an Open GL frames per second score of just 9.74, compared with 35 on the MacBook Pro.

Even so, that is not to say there’s no graphics power here – it snaps by means of iPhoto and iMovie and the SSD indicates that apps boot and run practically instantly. Real-globe performance is staggering. However, if you are looking for some thing to use Final Cut or Photoshop on, you will notice the benefit of a MacBook Pro.

The original MacBook Air had a poor battery life of just over two and a half hours, the last generation ran for about six hours as does this latest model, though when maxxing out the Core i7 we noticed that battery life decreased significantly.

You’ll also notice that when the processor is running speedily, the fan – once again concealed behind the screen hinge – is fairly noisy, while when the processor is working overtime the heat produced is rather surprising. Even so, our surprise is most likely misplaced, as this is such a thin notebook it’s perfectly reasonable that you will feel some heat – here it is in the best left of the keyboard.

MacBook air keyboard

Sleep and resume is quite much instantaneous, one thing we totally loved about the last Air and, here again, it’s like a breath of fresh air. Mac owners are used to great resume times but if you’re employed to making use of a PC, it is a completely transformed encounter.

As for Lion, it is a excellent operating program – check our our OS X 10.7 Lion assessment. We did have some teething troubles with it running on the Air although. This is a straight-from-the-box system and at 1 point, the screen went completely black. At an additional, it completely crashed out and we had to restart. And there’s a nasty pause whenever you plug any headphones or similar into the 3.5mm jack – strange. Not flawless then.

MacBook air

Macbook air 2011

If you can spare the not-inconsiderable cash, the 2011 MacBook Air is 1 hell of a power portable whichever model you decide to plump for.

Our choose of the 13-inch models is the lower-finish £1,099 variant. It’s 128GB SSD may not be the greatest, but that is the only thing that’s lacking compared to its much more costly sibling is the bigger SSD. And at £250 a lot more, you’d far better be positive that you require that additional storage.

We liked

The MacBook Air is a stunning machine in terms of looks and now, brilliantly, in terms of performance for most requirements. For common computing, for web and office apps, for music and digital photos, issues seem a breeze – specifically with the 4GB of memory included with all 13-inch variants. In our opinion, the £849 11-inch MacBook Air just doesn’t have very sufficient scope with 2GB.

We disliked

There is fairly small to actively dislike here, but we have to say that the expense is a problem. Mac converts won’t have a problem with this but on sheer price-of-hardware, it is just not at the races compared to the equivalent PCs. There’s still a lack of performance with the Air, but this time it’s right at the high end. And if you need to have your Mac to do video and high-end photo editing you will need a MacBook Pro. Don’t obtain an Air if you’re hoping to complete these tasks. Yes, there is excellent performance here, but for general computing tasks. Also bear in mind that, although the SSD is quickly, make positive it is not going to restrict you in terms of capacity.

Verdict

This Nonetheless, the benchmarks are clear – if it is high-finish job-orientated or gaming performance you want, you want a MacBook Pro. If you do not want that extra oomph, a MacBook Air is 1 of the very finest laptops on the market place. Sleek. Effective. A real statement and pretty handy at every single common task. But you are digging quite deep for the pleasure of owning 1.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Review: Panasonic Toughbook CF-53

Panasonic has 3 classes in its Toughbook range: Totally ruggedised, semi ruggedised and enterprise ruggedised. The CF-53 is component of the semi-ruggedised range and is as a result balanced among durability and performance.

It’s not meant for exploring the Masai Mara, but it is a perfect machine for the bumps and knocks of a travelling organization specialist or anyone who frequently works outside.

The create high quality is better than something we’ve noticed lately and Panasonic has taken care to make the style as appealing as it is usable. The silver lid has slight structured ridges in spot, and lifts on solid hinges after becoming unhooked from the chassis.

The keyboard is compact and located in the centre of the chassis with space either side for the speakers. Unsurprisingly, there was no flex around any portion of the keyboard or touchpad. The solid design means that you can drop the Toughbook from up to 76cm with out affecting performance. So there is no require to worry if it takes a tumble from either your desk or your lap.

Panasonic has added a manage to the base of the CF-53 so you can carry it about like a briefcase. Just beware that at two.7kg, it is not that light.

The compact keyboard limits the amount of dust and grime that can get among the keys. Any liquid spilled over keyboard will filter into grooves laid underneath the keys and run out the side of the chassis.

The 14-inch display is capable of Full HD detail, but lacks a Super-TFT coating. That means you will not get distracted by reflections when utilizing the laptop outside or in brightly lit areas. Certainly, movies and pictures won’t appear as good as on a Super-TFT screen, but the CF-53 sticks resolutely to the ‘form follows function’ rule of design.

Panasonic has built the Toughbook about an Intel Sandy Bridge Core i5-2510M processor, which coped extremely effectively with our tests. The added 4GB of RAM is the minimum you would anticipate on a organization machine at this cost.

There is no dedicated graphics card, as this machine is not designed for playing games. However, the integrated Intel HD 3000 GPU will be able to quickly handle much less complicated tasks such as browsing detailed internet sites.

Tech Labs

Tech labs

Battery Eater 2005: 273 minutes
Cinebench: 7670
3DMark 2006: 7934

The CF-53 has a 320GB tough drive, which once more is pretty normal nowadays, but a extremely impressive battery life of 273 minutes.

As this is a device made for travelling, there are plenty of ports for peripherals, such as 3 USB 2. and 1 USB 3. socket. There are both HDMI and VGA Out connections for utilizing the Toughbook with an external monitor. All the connection ports (except the headphone and microphone sockets) are protected by plastic shields.

Getting a Panasonic Toughbook is in no way going to be cheap, but in terms of company or outdoor computing, the CF-53 is 1 of the most durable laptops we’ve ever noticed. The Sandy Bridge technology and decent battery life mean it’s no slouch when it comes to performance either.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Assessment: Apple MacBook Pro 17-inch two.2GHz

Apple’s most costly MacBook Pro offers very related specifications to the high-finish 15-inch model.

Both have a brand-new, second-generation ‘Sandy Bridge’ quad-core two.2GHz Core i7 processor with integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000.

Each bring us an AMD Radeon HD 6750M discrete graphics processor with 1GB of GDDR5 memory, a 750GB, 5400RPM SATA tough drive, 4GB of 1,333MHz RAM and an internal seven-hour battery.

And each have a single FireWire 800 port as effectively as a Thunderbolt port, Intel’s exciting new I/O technologies providing up to 10Gbps transfer speeds in both directions.

Apart from the screen sizes, the only important differences in between the two high-finish off-the-shelf MacBook Pros is that this 17-inch model has three USB ports rather of two, and an ExpressCard / 34 slot instead of an SDXC card reader.

The 17-inch MacBook Pro is aimed at men and women who need to have extreme performance as well as a bigger screen. It is perfect for graphic designers who require all the screen space they can get and sufficient processing power to render complex images and artwork.

Likewise, video editors require sufficient room to fine-tune their projects without losing sight of the massive picture, and enough power to save them out in a reasonable time.

The Mac isn’t most people’s selection of gaming machine, but this one is surely potent sufficient to manage existing games, and individuals who need to have lots of windows open would welcome the extra screen space.

Tech Labs

Tech labs

Cinebench: Higher is much better

Cinebench

Doom 3: FPS: Greater is far better

Doom 3

iTunes encoding

iTunes

The days when notebooks played second fiddle to desktops are long behind us. Today’s MacBooks – particularly this new MacBook Pro – are potent enough to use as a main personal computer, and ideal for those who want a desktop setup but with a Mac they can choose up and use on the move when necessary. But is picking it up and taking it away a difficulty? How portable can a notebook with a 17-inch screen in fact be?

This is where Apple’s 17-inch MacBook Pro really shines. Its unibody aluminium construction lends it strength, but keeps it light. At 2.99kg, it is only 18% heavier than the 15-inch model, and only marginally a lot more bulky. As long as your notebook bag is massive sufficient to fit it, portability isn’t a problem.

It is good that the new 17-inch MacBook Pro enjoys parity with the greater of the two 15-inch models brought to us by the early 2011 refresh. Before, it had the identical specs as the middle of 3 15-inch MacBook Pros, which seemed wrong.

But now, Apple’s new leading-of-the range notebook is challenging to beat. It’s extremely powerful, has an superb screen and is beautifully portable for a 17-inch model.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Assessment: Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11

Vegas Movie HD Platinum 11 has just been released as a standalone program. Selling for around £60, it’s fairly cheap for a video editor, particularly 1 that offers so numerous characteristics – but it’s only about £15 less than the full Sony Imagination Studio Suite.

The suite’s edition of the software program is a couple of versions old, but you also get a lot of extra tools as nicely. So is Vegas Movie HD Platinum 11 worth the expense by itself?

You will either be disappointed or elated to understand that one of the most substantial new capabilities is 3D compatibility. So you can import and edit 3D footage from dual-lens cameras and camcorders, and export them in a number of distinct formats, like Nvidia 3D Vision and normal anaglyph. You can also burn to common 3D Blu-ray discs.

As you’d expect from Sony, who has been busy trying to convince us of 3D’s value, it is the most accomplished and least gimmicky implementation of 3D we’ve noticed in a video editor, but if you have no interest in 3D, then that isn’t going to sway you.

New features that may possibly make a lot more of an impact contain an improve in support for file formats, GPU-accelerated AVC encoding (which makes a huge distinction to speed) and a new video effects SDK for developers to develop plug-ins.

It’s not enough to advise an upgrade from version 10, but if you’re fed up with your existing video editing software program and have in no way tried Vegas Movie, then it is surely worth acquiring.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Review: Fluid Mask three.2

Fluid Mask 3.two is an accomplished plug-in for Adobe Photoshop and Photoshop Elements that adds a entire suite of effective image masking tools to the well-known image editor.

Image masking lets you isolate and cut out parts of a photo, and Fluid Mask three.2 contains capabilities that make the process less complicated and a lot more dependable.

Because this is each a plug-in and a standalone item, time and technologies has been spent on perfecting the tools, with quite impressive results. The tools included with Fluid Mask three.2 are a lot much more potent than those supplied with common photo editing software program.

Users of Photoshop Elements will see the greatest improvement, even though we feel even professionals utilizing the full version of Photoshop will be impressed.

Fluid Mask three.2 identifies and segments images according to colours and tones, and for the most portion it does a excellent job. Similar tones can at times get mixed up, although – in 1 test photo, a person’s arm and the desk behind it had been identified as the exact same colour and combined as one.

This was quickly rectified by drawing a line with the Forced Edge tool by way of the choice, dividing it along the edges of the objects. With care and attention, even fine hairs can be identified and busy backgrounds removed.

1 of the excellent issues about Fluid Mask 3.two is that you don’t need to be a professional artist to use its effective tools. Image segmentation, edge blending and other complex masking strategies can be implemented easily.

A handy Tip pane gives you in-depth details about each and every tool you click on, without being patronising or obstructing your work with annoying pop-up windows. If you are much more confident in high-level photo editing, you can tweak and edit the tools, and with a little effort the outcomes can be incredible.

As mentioned, if you do not have access to Adobe’s software, Fluid Mask three.2 also comes with a standalone editor for using its tools, although it works best as a plug-in for the more advanced package.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Evaluation: Panda Net Security 2012

Even though the current trend in internet security suites is to sit quietly in the background and protect the user’s PC with the minimum of fuss and nuisance, we located that Panda Net Security would occasionally display a popup from the taskbar.

These messages, recognized as ‘Panda Bulletins’, can be turned off, but they are distracting.

The interface is straightforward and clear, with an emphasis on delivering crucial details rather than eye-pleasing graphics. This is 1 reason why Panda Internet Security 2012 feels much less method resource hungry than some of its flashier competitors.

Although we ran the initial scan, we identified our test PC was much much more responsive than when Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 was running, with CPU usage hovering around 28 to 30 per cent and peaking at 70 per cent.

The scan took one hour 52 minutes, and highlighted a number of tracking cookies that Kaspersky and G Information ignored. This is as considerably a case of over-zealousness on Panda’s portion as it is carelessness on the others’. The files identified were annoyances a finest, however Panda identified them as ‘Spyware programs’.

The Panda SafeBrowser is sandboxed browser that runs in VirtualBox and can be used to access potentially dangerous internet sites. A virtual keyboard is also included to aid thwart keylogging software when you’re typing in passwords.

We can’t assist but really feel that this addition is a bit redundant – if the antivirus scan, download scan and included firewall are doing their jobs then there ought to be no keylogging software program installed on your PC in the first place.

An over-cautious world wide web security package is much better than one that takes securing your PC for granted, and Panda Web Security 2012 works tough to offer you a feature-packed security suite.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Review: MSI A75MA-G55

As part of the review kit for the AMD A8-3850 Fusion APU we were supplied with this MSI A75MA-G55. The Fusion chips ought to be at property in these sorts of little scale motherboards.

And lately it is all been about the modest form factor motherboard.

The microATX form factor has been making one hell of a comeback because so a lot of your PC’s tech has disappeared beneath the unassuming heatspreader of the central chunk of silicon in your machine.

Because graphics began to come back on-die it has freed up a hell of a lot of genuine-estate on the motherboard.

You can go one of two methods then, either cram in a load of, possibly, useless extras or trim down the footprint of the board to shave off the unnecessary space.

We’ve noticed some tiny H67 and Z68 boards recently, even going as far as the mini-ITX form factor, and this MSI A75MA-G55 is the first AMD Llano Fusion board we’ve noticed on a smaller scale.

The desktop version of Llano, the Lynx platform, lends itself perfectly to this smaller form factor.

With impressive integrated graphics efficiency and low-energy requirements the A-series APUs make the best HTPC that may possibly occasionally want to turn its hand to a li’l light gaming.

MSI a75ma-g55

The Asus and MSI boards are incredibly close in performance terms when it comes to stock speeds, below although it’s obvious the level of extra performance the Asus’ overclocking capabilities delivers.

Still, the MSI copes happily with the Dual Graphics choice, offering decent performance in the hybrid CrossFire mode and with improved RAM speeds.

MSI a75ma-g55 benchmarks

As a complete we’ve been impressed by what the desktop version of AMD’s Llano can generate, each in terms of graphics and far more surprisingly in its raw computational chops.

We paired up AMD’s leading APU, the A8-3850, with this board from MSI to see what we could get out of this smaller mobo compared with the full-fat Asus F1A75-V Pro.

At stock speeds it is all excellent.

The MSI board happily keeps pace with the larger Asus providing, with performance only a shade off. The A75MA-G55 is also rather nicely-heeled in the functions department too, showing off full SATA 6Gb/s coverage and USB 3. sockets out back and by means of a break-out box too.

With a small light coaxing we also managed to squeeze out 1,600MHz from our DDR3 RAM, making a surprising distinction in games performance – specially with a discrete card installed in Dual Graphics mode too.

But this is a brand new chipset and brand new software too, so it is only to be expected that there be teething troubles with the BIOS.

It took a little extra effort to get the extra memory speed, but sadly the very same though couldn’t be mentioned for any overclocking shenanigans.

The amount of overclocking headroom in the Llano desktop APU is one of the items that impressed us most. The notebook version had a really weak CPU portion, but the Lynx platform has a lot of prospective in it.

We managed to hit 3.7GHz with our two.9GHz APU sample on the Asus motherboard.

According to MSI’s old school, non-EFI BIOS we were able to hit over 5GHz on air. Unfortunately our astonishment at this feat evaporated when it transpired the motherboard was performing nothing of the sort.

In fact we couldn’t force any additional efficiency out of the A8-3850 APU at all. Not a single silicon sausage.

Now as an HTPC it is not a huge difficulty, and I’m positive subsequent BIOS updates may possibly well impact a alter in this lack of performance, but for now it is tough to advise understanding what you could get out of that APU.

We liked

As an HTPC motherboard, with no pretentions towards enthusiast efficiency, it is a excellent price and fit for the mATX scale and AMD Llano Fusion APUs.

It’s also impressive that you can get almost the very same stock efficiency out of this motherboard as the much more costly Asus board.

We disliked

As much as it’s not so important for the HTPC arena this board’s aimed at, the reality there is zero overclocking capability is a bit of a downer. Although that does appear like a BIOS issue rather than a hardware failure.

Final word

As a form factor the mATX size is a excellent match for the Llano platform, this vaguely broken MSI board however is presently something but a ideal match.

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Assessment: Microsoft Office 365

Microsoft has dabbled in online collaboration just before. The SharePoint service may not have set the planet alight, but it was a dependable package.

Microsoft Office 365 unites SharePoint with the online version of Microsoft Office – Office Internet Apps.

Given that the launch of Windows Telephone 7, Microsoft has been much more focused than ever on smartphones, and its renewed interest in this marketplace has led to some helpful smartphone integration.

The 2010 versions of Microsoft Exchange and Lync are also included, providing very good functions for modest companies.

Tying it all together

Office 365 is aimed at little organizations that might not have devoted IT staff, so the ease with which its advanced features can be set up and configured is extremely commendable.

There are short video tutorials that helped us set up Office 365 significantly quicker than we ever managed with SharePoint. When signing up for the service, we were given a ‘.onmicrosoft.com’ domain name. Importing an existing domain name is fairly straightforward, and worth performing if you want to incorporate Office 365 with your existing business web site and email.

If you don’t already have your own site, Office 365 comes with a basic website builder. We had been able to make a reasonable looking internet site in a couple of minutes using the included templates, stock photos and clipart. The internet sites you make with this will not win any style awards, but they appear excellent enough and, most importantly, are straightforward to create.

The Microsoft Exchange 2010 service is the most complex of the services to set up, and possibly the most essential to get correct, but it means you can send and receive emails, and share calendars and contacts. These can be accessed by means of a desktop e-mail program, via a smartphone or by way of Outlook Internet Access – a pared-down web version of Outlook.

Outlook Internet Access 2010 includes some handy updates, like a quicker, a lot more responsive interface and improved support for browsers other than Net Explorer.

Ease of use

We had Office 2010 software program installed on our test machines, and we were able to configure them to interact with 365 by clicking the ‘Set up’ button in the ‘Downloads’ section. This downloaded and installed a number of updates that let us use our desktop applications with 365 – saving documents straight from Word to the on the web SharePoint server, for example.

As you might anticipate from Microsoft, we had to install many updates, with some updated programs then requiring other programs to be updated, and so on. It wasn’t the smoothest of operations, but it was a great time-saver when employed with numerous PCs.

It does mean that you want to have Microsoft Office 2007 or 2010 installed if you don’t, some of the most beneficial functions will be lost.

It’s clear that Microsoft Office 365 has been optimised to work with devices running Windows, Microsoft Office and Windows Telephone 7. If your enterprise utilizes OS X, Google Docs or Android smartphones, Google Apps provides far more choice.

Microsoft Office 365 has had by way of lengthy beta testing, and with Microsoft’s expertise in creating office software program, the resulting service strikes a good balance between power, attributes and simplicity. It delivers much the same functionality as Google Apps, with the same 99.9 per cent uptime guarantee, and is just a little a lot more pricey.

Microsoft Office 365 is more streamlined, with its services integrating considerably better than Google’s different goods. If your tiny company already makes use of Microsoft Office products then this is an exceptional accompaniment, although if you do not want to be tied to Microsoft goods, Google Apps presents far more flexibility.

Related Links

TechRadar: All PC & Mac feeds

Posted in Product Reviews0 Comments

Advert
TechAlps on Facebook