Tag Archive | "Tested"

LTE-Advanced Tested in Korea


Korean researchers successfully demonstrated LTE-Advanced technology, which is six times faster than the upcoming LTE network (up to 100 Mbps). The ITU has designated two methods to deploy 100 Mbps mobile networks, one based on LTE (LTE-Advanced) and one based on WiMAX 2.0 (802.16m)

The state-run Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) demonstrated an evolved Multimedia Broadcast and Multicast Service (eMBMS). This technology also enables users to watch 3D TV videos in a moving car.

ETRI brought in 470 researchers to develop comprehensive LTE-Advanced technology. ETRI secured 24 standard patents and 500 patent applications. While the final international standard for 4G is expected to be released in April this year, ETRI’s LTE-Advanced technology will fulfill 95% of the standard, except for some functions such as sleep mode, the state-run research institute said.

The ITU’s Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R), completed the assessment of six candidate submissions for a global 4G broadband technology, last year. In October, the ITU proclaimed that only “LTE-Advanced” and “WirelessMAN-Advanced” would being accorded the official designation of IMT-Advanced, qualifying them as true 4G technologies.

An ITU committee will finalize IEEE 802.16m this March following a technical meetings in Taipei earlier this month. The first 802.16m dongles should be available to consumers in late 2011, with more wide-spread commercial deployments starting in 2012 (pdf).

The WiMAX Forum has started the WiMAX Release 2 project, to test for interoperability between different vendors.

Both LTE Advanced and WirelessMAN-Advanced (802.16m) are the real deal — ITU sanctioned 4G standards. Both will deliver up to 100 Mbps (mobile) and up to 1 Gbps (fixed). In order to deliver those speeds, however, both need 20 Mhz wide channels and up to 4×4 MIMO antennas on both the receiver and basestation.

Final ratification of the full IMT-Advanced technology family took place at the ITU-R Study Group meeting on November 22 and 23 in Geneva, Switzerland.

The standards will now move into the final stage of the IMT-Advanced process, which provides for the development in early 2012 of an ITU-R Recommendation specifying the in-depth technical standards for these radio technologies.

View full post on dailywireless.org

Posted in WirelessComments (0)

Motorola Droid Bionic tested and kicking butt


droidbionic

At CES 2011, talkandroid was there and got to play with the impressive Motorola Droid Bionic. It is a sweet little device, as you can tell in our Hands-On video here. To add to it’s awesomeness, some others got to run some benchmarks on it, and not surprisingly, it put up some kick butt numbers in comparison to other “top devices” currently on the market as you can see below.
Droid_Bionic_Quadrant

There’s many tools out there to benchmark an Android device, but Quadrant seems to be the favorite, scoring the Droid Bionic 2284 putting it well above other previously released Android smartphones.
Check the full test video from CES below.

Motorola Droid Bionic tested and kicking butt



View full post on Android News, Rumours, and Updates

Posted in AndroidComments (0)

Lab tested: 21.5- and 27-inch Core i3 iMacs/3.2GHz


Straight from Macworld Lab: Benchmark results of two new iMacs, both of which sport Intel’s 3.2GHz Core i3 processor.




View full post on Macworld

Posted in AppleComments (0)

Lab tested: 21.5-inch Core i3 iMac/3.06GHz


Macworld Lab has tested the new entry-level iMac powered by the Core i3 processor; here’s our test report.




View full post on Macworld

Posted in AppleComments (0)

Glaring Omissions — Polarized Sunglasses Field Tested + Rated


Product: Polarized Sunglasses

Manufacturer: Roundup:

Wired Rating: 0

When you’re fishing or biking or driving (really anytime you’re outdoors) you’d do well to strap on a set of sunglasses with polarized lenses. These optics are designed to filter glare from notoriously reflective surfaces like water, asphalt and sand. The best ones are capable multitaskers, winnowing harsh photons without distorting colors, all while looking effortlessly cool.

Ray Ban P

Ray-Ban 8041 Aviator Titanium

There’s a reason why pilots, cops and your dad have been wearing aviators for years. They look tough and provide Secret Service-level protection for your eyes. Ray-Ban’s model 8041 amps things up by adding polarized lenses and titanium frames to the equation. Bright, overhead retina-searing sunlight? Filtered handily without a hint of color distortion. In our water tests, the lenses drastically cut glare, even when the surface became choppy. And the titanium frames are a revelation for the accident-prone. We repeatedly sat on, dropped and haphazardly tossed the frames without seeing them get bent out of shape. Best of all the specs look good on everyone. An assortment of folks in the Wired office modeled the 8041s; some with enormous heads, others with mighty shocks of hair, and folks with slim, angular faces. Without exception, everyone looked awesome wearing aviators, despite not being jet-jockeys or police. (We did have a few dads.)

WIRED Frames are the ideal mix of ruggedness and style. Look good on everyone regardless of head size or face shape. Titanium frames sits snugly on your face and never get uncomfortable. Kills virtually all glare dead.

TIRED Lenses not as tough as frames — they scratched like a pissed off tabby. Tough to keep clean; oily residue built up faster than a beach along the gulf coast.

$215, ray-ban.com

Persol

Persol PO2979S

For style, you can’t beat a pair of tortoise-shell Persols. (Just ask this guy.) The lenses handily eliminate aquatic glare, but they really distinguished themselves behind the wheel: The Persols distilled the reflection from asphalt better than any other model we tested. The lenses are tough, too — a series of drops onto concrete and sand didn’t leave a single mark on the optics. The frames however are a bit hefty and often slid off our tester’s nose when his proboscis got sweaty. Still, when you look almost as cool as McQueen these are the most minor of quibbles.

WIRED Cooler than the surface of Neptune. Earned top marks in driving performance. Lenses resist damage like +2 armor.

TIRED Thick, heavy frames slide off face fairly easily (unless you have a Cyrano De Bergerac sized schnozzle). Collects dirt and grime faster than a hobo with poor hygiene.

$255, persol.com/usa

Oakley FrogSkin

Oakley Polarized Frogskins

The Frogskins may look retro but they’re the lightest and most comfortable of all the shades we tested. We took them rafting (class 3 rapids, what?!) and they stayed secure despite some nasty drops, hard bumps, and one unplanned trip over the side of the vessel. They’re not bad at filtering out glare either with a subtle amber tint and very little color distortion. We really only have two slight gripes: 1) These frames are so lithe we often forgot we were wearing them in the first place. 2) The white Oakley logo that mars the side of each arm is hopelessly garish. Sorry guys, if we wanted to advertise that badly we’d go to work for Wieden+Kennedy.

WIRED Lenses and frames so light (1 ounce!), you swear they’re filled with helium. Metal-free joints lend an uncomplicated, casual feel. Quite possibly the best-looking design Oakley carries. Barely a hint of color distortion.

TIRED Enormous Oakley logo is seriously gauche, despite ’80s-era typeface. So little mass, some say they feel cheap.

$140, oakley.com

Zeal Optics

Zeal Optics Zyaa

Does looking like Bono from the Zooropa era sound like a smart look to go for? Then you might want to reach for a pair of the Zyaas. While the large, wrap-arounds actually did a fairly decent job of eliminating water-reflected glare; color filtration is not exactly stellar. Looking at the world through these glasses yielded a brownish-pink hue that is almost gut wrenching after long exposures. While extremely light (1.3 ounces) the Zyaas are also cheap in terms of construction and cost. But if you’re looking to get polarized at a low price, there are a lot worse choices than these specs.

WIRED Supremely light and quite comfy. Stays securely fastened to face no matter what crazy-ass (white-water rafting, mountain biking) conditions you put them in. Can you argue with that price? No. No you can’t.

TIRED A bit ridiculous looking on most people. Huge “Z” adorning each arm screams gelled hair and tribal tats. Color filtration is more warped than Lindsay Lohan’s legal defense.

$100, zealoptics.com


View full post on Wired Product Reviews

Posted in Product ReviewsComments (0)

Rapid Transit: River Shoes Tested + Rated


Product: River Shoes

Manufacturer: Roundup:

Wired Rating: 0

Cold water. Hot sun. Sharp rocks. Slick docks. These obstacles mean nothing when traversing bodies of water with a good set of river shoes. The best ones will offer protection up top, and security below to keep you stepping, wet or dry.

New Balance SM921

If you want to make fast tracks across wet terrain, this lightweight low-impact river runner will add some serious twinkle to your toes. These kicks clocks in at a mere 11.3 ounces, and features a stable, running shoe-style sole with solid yet lightweight lugs that provide ample traction without stacking on grams. A quick-pull lacing system lets you enter and exit easily, and keeps the shoe secure on the foot so it won’t rub and cause blisters when wet. The mesh upper is flexible and light, and moves like a second layer of skin. We loved this shoe on a 5K run along the beach for crashing in and out of surf, and it was also our favorite for trail running.

But while it makes a great runner, its true calling is the life aquatic. Eight large holes along the sole evacuate water just about as quickly as it comes in. Likewise, a perforated rubber insole moves water through quickly without absorbing it along the way. Even better, not only does it let water escape, but sand and fine particulate matter also passes out of the shoe, rather than piling up in the toe or heel. When scrambling over wet rocks and wood, we kept a steady footing and were never in jeopardy of slipping. We were also pleasantly surprised to find that the mesh upper does a fantastic job keeping dry sand out, another reason we loved this shoe for athletic adventures around the water’s edge. Finally, the shoe dried extremely quickly in all circumstances, both in direct sun, and at home in a dark closet.

However, the SM921 did strike a couple of sour notes. While the quick-pull lacing system meant the shoes went on easily, it also meant the shoe sometimes slipped off the foot occasionally. When we tried trudging our way through deep mud, for example, we had to work to keep the shoe on our foot, and our heel came fully out multiple times. For the same reasons, small pebbles and other debris can come in around the ankle. And while the lightweight construction is great for fleet-footed excursions, it also means that the shoe doesn’t offer much stability against turning an ankle, or smashing your toes against the rocks. You’ll also feel sharp edges underfoot.

These are minor quibbles though. Overall, this shoe is an excellent choice for those who will be frequently moving back and forth from wet to dry and want something that provides freedom of movement, top of the foot protection, and underfoot traction.

WIRED Evacuates mud and sand like the Nile River. Dries exceptionally fast. Extremely lightweight and low impact, almost feels like being barefoot. Best beach runner we’ve ever sprinted across the sands in.

TIRED Comes off of foot waaay too easily. Pebbles and other debris get a free pass into shoe.

$90, newbalance.com



Keen Cimarron II

Keen Cimarron II

When it comes to all-around wet-and-dry performance, we were blown away by the versatile Cimarron II. The 12.1-ounce shoe is lightweight, and secures nicely via quick-pull laces. Loops on the tongue and heel help you get the shoe on and off quickly. Thick multidirectional lugs provide nice traction. And the webbed mesh upper provided both protection, and a degree of warmth in cold water. It all stacked up to a shoe that did just about everything well.

As a hiker, the Keen’s sturdy sole with protection for toes and heel proved stable and secure; we navigated rocky off-trail sections with peace of mind and without having to focus on our feet. It even made a passable trail runner that we logged a beach-side 5K in without any discomfort. In the water, it handled slick surfaces exceptionally well, and was also solid on sharp rocks thanks to a very rigid sole. We were also pleased with its performance in the mud, where it stayed on our feet even after sinking completely below the surface into the muck. While our heel did come up in the back end of the shoe, it never came out.

Yet we did have a few nits to pick out of these kicks. It did a fine job keeping out small pebbles and debris, but it did allow quite a bit of sand and smaller particulate matter in. And because silt is not easily flushed out, it tended to collect in the toebox, which was uncomfortable. Also, if you do manage to get a small pebble in there, you’ll have to take your shoes off to get it out again. Finally, while it does shed excess water, it doesn’t dry quickly. It was much slower to dry — both indoors and out — than the other two shoes we tested along side it. The wet upper combined with the collected sand rubbed our skin, but not in a good way.
The bottom line is that the Cimarron II is a very solid well-rounded performer. It wasn’t the best at anything, but it was pretty great at just about everything we threw at it. For a combination rafting and hiking shoe, it was aces.

WIRED Stuck to slippery rocks like a starfish. Heavy-duty toe and heel will keep your feet from getting stubbed out. First rate trail shoe; handled hiking and scrambling across rocks as well as it did water.

TIRED Tends to collect silt and sand. Very slow to dry, our feet stayed soggy in these suckers all day.

$100, keenfootwear.com



Teva Avator SR

Teva Avator SR

While most river shoes are simply wetware versions of athletic shoes, the Teva Avator resemble work boots. The neoprene upper extends above the ankle, and it secures by means of a Velcro closure, plus two adjustable straps. Thick padding at the ankle and a stiff rubberized cup in the rear behind the heel offer some protection to keep your ankle from turning. Likewise, a stiff toe cup will keep you from totaling your toes on underwater rocks or other jagged edges. The hard sole was ace for stepping on sharp rocks and uncertain terrain, providing a secure platform that even stood up to a light stabbing from a Swiss Army knife.

And yet this work boot is very much a submersible shoe. Vents by the toe and heel allow water to escape, while the neoprene not only dries quickly, but it also keeps your feet relatively warm in cold river or ocean water. The adjustable straps stay closed no matter how turbulent the water, or what you wedge your foot in below its surface. Even when we plunged this shoe calf-deep in the mud, it never budged. Seriously, you’re more likely to have a beaver gnaw your foot off than you are to lose it in the water. Likewise, the ankle-high closure keeps out not only H2O but also dirt, grime and even fine sand. We were also surprised at how quickly the shoe dried. Although it has much more material than the New Balance 921 or Keen Cimarron II that we tested simultaneously, it was the first to dry in cool indoor conditions. It is, however, slow to drain, and in the sun it retained water longer than the others.

While we’re mostly positive on this kicker, but the shoe isn’t much of an athletic performer. The rigid ankle makes running and scrambling in it awkward, while the largely flat sole tends to become caked in sand and mud, and slips repeatedly on slick rocks and wet wood. It was also quite hot. While the neoprene upper is great for those moments when your dogs are sunk in chilly river water, in the sun they can get quite hot (and more than a little slimy) when you’re sitting in the sun.

Overall, we were impressed with the Avator, but it seems best suited to occasional splashes and is more of a workhorse than a thoroughbred.

WIRED More secure than a 64-character password; this shoe will not accidentally come off your foot. Exceptionally stable, great for walking through water where one can’t see below the surface. Neoprene upper kept our toes toasty. Dries quickly.

TIRED Banana peel-slick soles slid off algae-covered rocks like a fried egg off oiled Teflon. Slow to drain.

$90, teva.com


View full post on Wired Product Reviews

Posted in Product ReviewsComments (0)

Double Your Pleasure: 2-Person Tents Tested


Product: 2-Person Tents

Manufacturer: Roundup:

Wired Rating: 0

Three may be company, but we’re more than happy to just double up — especially when it comes to camping. These two-person tents are perfect for sheltering you and a pal anywhere from the valley floor of Yosemite to the untamed wilderness of your own backyard.

MSR Carbon Reflex 2

The Carbon Reflex 2 is the Winnie Cooper of two-person backpacking tents — sweet, sensible and not without its charms. Its two-pole frame is quick and easy to set up. It’s also possible, if somewhat awkward, to set up the fly without the tent, which is a nice option: You can erect the tent under the fly to avoid getting the interior soaked under heavy rain, or you can set up the fly by itself for a quick bivy. Mesh sidewalls make the Reflex 2 incredibly breathable, even when the fly is on. And for such a light weight — less than 4 pounds with the ground sheet — the tent’s interior feels luxuriously spacious with 40 inches of headroom. A minor point: Brick red and canary yellow is a color combination that brings to mind carrot-flavored baby barf. But like Winnie’s turtleneck sweaters, it’s at most a cosmetic defect. And one we’re willing to overlook.

WIRED Aluminum needle stakes are lightweight, easy to use and attractive. Fly can be erected separately. Quick setup.

TIRED Gaudier than Liberace’s entire wardrobe. Drafty in inclement weather.

$400, msrcorp.com


Big Agnes Fly Creek UL2

Big Agnes Fly Creek UL2

The Fly Creek is a tent aimed at beginning backpackers, which is to say — light, small, and not the most comfortable night’s sleep in the world. The tent’s dimensions were by far the most cramped of all the ones we tested. While the specs state that the UL2 offers 38 inches of headroom, those inches are towards the back of the structure instead of front where your head is. This makes putting on your pants a grueling, horizontal task if it’s cold or raining outside. Moreover, the Fly Creek must be thoroughly staked out to produce those dimensions, including two crucial stakes on each of the tent’s sidewalls. Rocky campsites cause the tent to collapse on itself, shrinking from 28 square feet of floorspace to what feels like about 5. Missing any stakes lets the UL2 flap noisily in the wind, while the miniature vestibule leaves packs and boots exposed to the elements. On the other hand, the ultralight silicone of the tent and fly felt like silk, packed up small, and kept out the fiercest cliffside breezes and rain. The Fly Creek is ideal for Daniel Boones who like to go fast and travel alone.

WIRED Unbelievably light (a shade over 2 pounds with groundsheet). Fly and tent pack smaller than a grapefruit. Single-hub pole setup is fast and easy. Interior gear loft. Well-ventilated, even under the fly.

TIRED Suitable for only diminutive hikers. Small vestibule leaves boots and bags soaking wet.

$350, bigagnes.com


Nemo Morpho 2P

Nemo Morpho 2P

Inflatable supports are a nifty idea in theory, but in reality the Morpho 2P suffers from several fatal flaws. Two thick, sturdy air booms support the Morpho in the front and back but not in between, which makes the tent difficult to pick up and shake out when damp or dirty. Moreover, the air booms save neither time nor weight. Each took about 30 seconds to inflate with the minuscule foot pump — which isn’t bad for a balloon-animal party, but a lot longer than the time it takes to assemble aluminum tent poles. And the tent itself was more than a pound heavier than any other tent tested. The integrated fly makes it impossible to separate the pieces to dry them or cut weight. And finally, for a three-season tent, it’s stuffy. The back vent is too small to allow much in-and-out air flow. Multiple interior pockets are a nice touch, but not enough to compensate for the tent’s deficiencies.

WIRED Booms stayed sturdy and inflated throughout rain and wind gusts. Inner vestibule keeps backpacks and boots dry. Convenient interior pockets. Cozy, cave-like interior.

TIRED Confusing setup. Heavy: 6 pounds with footprint. Gets hotter than a volcano stuffed with Victoria’s Secret catalogs.

$430, nemoequipment.com


Marmot Haven 2P

Marmot Haven 2P

The Haven 2P is the ideal tent for a Saturday beach trip with friends. Leave the optional floor at home to cut weight, and stake all eight corners in warm, soft sand. Then clip the single support pole into place and unzip the tent’s top vents with the convenient stiff handles. The 10-second setup complete, your whole family can then stretch out in the unbelievable 56 square feet of space in the Haven’s well-ventilated interior. Yes, the Haven would be perfect there … and nowhere else. It’s impossible to use in places with limited space or on rocky ground, as all eight corners need to be staked for the tent to be secure. Moreover, the Haven leaves a few inches of open space above the floor, giving vermin, wind and rain free access to your vulnerable, sleeping head. A three-season tent? It’s barely a weekend tent.

WIRED Light in proportion to the tent’s size. Removable floor lets warm-weather campers cut weight. Excellent ventilation. Plenty of room for bags, boots and people.

TIRED Freezing in temperatures below 55 degrees. Gap between tent and floor lets dogs wriggle out and mosquitoes buzz in.

$200, marmot.com


View full post on Wired Product Reviews

Posted in Product ReviewsComments (1)

Google Voice Being Tested on PC’s at the ‘plex!




Here’s some exciting news  for you Google Voice users.  TechCrunch is reporting that Google is testing Voice on PC’s, allowing employees to make calls via their desktops.  This is a departure from having to link Google Voice numbers to an actual mobile phone or landline.

Google is “dogfooding” this application right now, which means that they are eating their own “food” in house and having employees test and use the software.  This type of application is seen to be the answer as to why Google acquired Gizmo5 last Fall, which was a competitor to Skype and other VoIP products.  There is no official launch date for a full rollout as of yet.  Most likely,  we will see it in  “beta” form, true to Google’s style.  Here’s to looking out for the launch of this new desktop application soon!

Might We Suggest…

  • Eating My Words Never Tasted so Good!
    And of course, I would be talking about the Nexus One, the most glorious Android phone to date.  About four months ago, I wrote an article called, “Don’t Hold Your Breath…”, talking about the fact …



View full post on AndroidGuys

Posted in AndroidComments (0)


Advert
TechAlps on Facebook